Re: [yocto] read-only-rootfs and opkg

2024-09-20 Thread Martin Siegumfeldt
Indeed, it was from a layer-local "opkg_%.bbappend" - moving to local.conf seems to do the trick. Yes I would like to use opkg runtime to be able to update individual components and also keep the meta-data updated, such that e.g. 'opkg info ' would indicate actuals. Runtime moving of the meta-

Re: [yocto] read-only-rootfs and opkg

2024-09-18 Thread Alex Stewart
__ From: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org on behalf of Martin Siegumfeldt Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 04:39 To: Stewart, Alex; yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [yocto] read-only-rootfs and opkg Hi Alex, Thanks for your input - highly appreciated. It appears you have a p

Re: [yocto] read-only-rootfs and opkg

2024-09-18 Thread Martin Siegumfeldt
Hi Alex, Thanks for your input - highly appreciated. It appears you have a point regarding the variable assignment - 'bitbake-getvar OPKGLIBDIR' indeed indicates the intended assignment does not occur: $ bitbake-getvar --value OPKGLIBDIR NOTE: Starting bitbake server... /var/lib Doing the stron

Re: [yocto] read-only-rootfs and opkg

2024-09-17 Thread Alex Stewart
lists.yoctoproject.org on behalf of Martin Siegumfeldt Sent: Monday, September 16, 2024 06:00 To: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [yocto] read-only-rootfs and opkg Hi all, I am trying to realize a rootfs backed by opkg as package manager. It appears that the opkg meta-dat

[yocto] read-only-rootfs and opkg

2024-09-16 Thread Martin Siegumfeldt
Hi all, I am trying to realize a rootfs backed by opkg as package manager. It appears that the opkg meta-data is directed to a volatile mount (triggered by read-only-rootfs feature in order to achieve write access I assume): $ tail -5 /etc/opkg/opkg.conf # Default destination for installed pack