[I posted this question on Stackoverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/q/77871008/8452187]
I have two images with the same distro and the same machine and each image
should contain the same package, but build with different settings.
For example, the config file sshd_config is part of the opensshd
Hello all. I've been using Yocto for a couple of years now and I primarily use
the dunfell and kirkstone branches. I have a question about the work flow
people generally use. When I started with Yocto I started with the dunfell
branch because I was working with the TI am57xx platform. I work
On 26 Jan 2024, at 17:14, Daniele Lugli via lists.yoctoproject.org
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 01:03 PM, Daniele Lugli wrote:
> I would like to have autotools available but to decide myself how to use
> them. Not possible?
Absolutely possible, the class source shows that it provides def
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 01:03 PM, Daniele Lugli wrote:
>
> I would like to have autotools available but to decide myself how to use
> them.
Not possible?
--
Daniele Lugli
General Logic srl
Viale Curreno, 41
10133 Torino
Italy
tel +39 329 3933041
www.general-logic.com ( http://www.general-logic.
Since the stable meta-oe branches tend to be updated once a month. Run
meta-oe-mirror twice a month to be sure to catch every update.
Signed-off-by: Yoann Congal
---
schedulers.py | 15 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py
in
From: Alexandre Belloni
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
---
schedulers.py | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py
index 9ffa88f5f384..5ddcc7a68ce9 100644
--- a/schedulers.py
+++ b/schedulers.py
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ def repos_for_builder(buildername):
On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 08:26 -0700, Joshua Watt wrote:
> I'd rather it stay on GitHub; I think it makes more sense _for this
> project_. First of all, it already is on GitHub, so moving it is
> likely more disruptive to the workflow
>
> Secondly, it already has CI setup through GitHub actions, whic
On Fri 2024-01-26 @ 01:33:15 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 17:58 -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
> > On 1/25/24 11:58, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > > On Wed 2024-01-24 @ 03:16:04 PM, Tim Orling wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:02 PM Joshua Watt
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
I'd rather it stay on GitHub; I think it makes more sense _for this
project_. First of all, it already is on GitHub, so moving it is
likely more disruptive to the workflow
Secondly, it already has CI setup through GitHub actions, which we
would need to spend effort to replicate elsewhere.
Thirdly
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 17:58 -0500, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 1/25/24 11:58, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > On Wed 2024-01-24 @ 03:16:04 PM, Tim Orling wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:02 PM Joshua Watt wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:59 AM Trevor Woerner
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
10 matches
Mail list logo