Re: ligature unknown to ghc

2009-03-05 Thread cognominal
I am indded trying to understand why a polish state machine is hidden in the yi sources so your paper url is welcome. On 5 mar, 09:31, Jean-Philippe Bernardy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:55 PM, cognominal wrote: > > → and ← were accepted by ghc 6.10.1 but were flagged as problematic by >

Re: ligature unknown to ghc

2009-03-05 Thread Jean-Philippe Bernardy
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:55 PM, cognominal wrote: > → and ← were accepted by ghc 6.10.1 but were flagged as problematic by > yi. That should be easy to fix, only I'm not sure if/how alex supports unicode. BTW, if you're interested in Polish parsers, you might want to look at my paper: http:/

ligature unknown to ghc

2009-03-04 Thread cognominal
I don't know yet the appropriate place to mention this shortcoming so I post here. I did a cut and paste of the parser in the excellent paper "Polish Parsers, Step by Step ". But that did not compile. Hopefully the syntax highlighting in emacs and yi gave me a clue. infixl had a ligature! I don't