Both vim and emacs open the minibuffer at the very bottom of the frame
regardless of the current window layout.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:03 AM, nicolas.pouillard <
nicolas.pouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Jean-Philippe Bernardy's message of Thu Mar 19 09:13:26 +0100
> 2009:
> >
> >
Excerpts from Jean-Philippe Bernardy's message of Thu Mar 19 09:13:26 +0100
2009:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> > If we do as you suggest and sort the minibuffer last instead of inserting it
> > last in the window list, then that will cause problems when we add th
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> If we do as you suggest and sort the minibuffer last instead of inserting it
> last in the window list, then that will cause problems when we add the
> ability to do a vertical split instead of just horizontal splits (I want to
> change the
If we do as you suggest and sort the minibuffer last instead of inserting it
last in the window list, then that will cause problems when we add the
ability to do a vertical split instead of just horizontal splits (I want to
change the window list into a window tree in order to add this).
On Wed, M
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> It seems like your real complaint is that you think it makes more sense to
> have the minibuffer directly below the buffer it's associated with. However,
> this breaks consistency with both vim and emacs, and it has its own problems
> (for e
It seems like your real complaint is that you think it makes more sense to
have the minibuffer directly below the buffer it's associated with. However,
this breaks consistency with both vim and emacs, and it has its own problems
(for example, if the minibuffer is below the top window in a 2-window
See issue 228. The reason that M-x works is that we did not remove all
workaround code.
Cheers,
JP.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> It does? If I try `M-x setAnyMode fundamental' with the point originating in
> the top window, the command affects the top window. Can you
It does? If I try `M-x setAnyMode fundamental' with the point originating in
the top window, the command affects the top window. Can you give an example
of a command that affects the bottom window instead?
-Kevin
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Jean-Philippe Bernardy <
jeanphilippe.berna...@gmail
This has the side effect that the command run in the minibuffer will
apply to the bottommost window -- and we do not want that.
If you really want to put miniwindows on the bottom, you should sort
windows (by isMini) just before displaying, in the UI code.
Cheers,
JP.
2009/3/16 :
> Mon Mar 16 1
Applied, thanks!
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:32 AM, wrote:
> Sun Jan 4 23:29:59 EST 2009 sasha.r...@gmail.com
> * Fix minibuffer issue in multiwindow environment
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Yi development mailing list
yi-devel@googlegroups.com
http://groups.go
Sun Jan 4 23:29:59 EST 2009 sasha.r...@gmail.com
* Fix minibuffer issue in multiwindow environment
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Yi development mailing list
yi-devel@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel
-~--~~~~--~~--~
11 matches
Mail list logo
