[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1322105] [NEW] NVP FWaaS occurs error when removing a rule which is shared by two firewalls

2014-05-22 Thread berlin
Public bug reported: Bugs reproduce process: 1. create a firewall rule and attache it to a firewall policy 2. create two firewalls with the firewall policy attached alternatively on two routers 3. remove the firewall rule from the firewall policy it would occur the following error: Traceback (

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1322076] [NEW] fwaas plugin doesn't need to handle delete firewall rule operation

2014-05-22 Thread berlin
Public bug reported: If firewall rule is attached to firewall policy, it would raise FirewallRuleInUse excpetion in DB ops, else it is a pure DB delete ops. So it is useless to handle delete_firewall_rule ops in fwaas plugin. ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Assignee: berlin

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1302333] Re: LBaaS haproxy process still wok after setting admin_state_up of VIP|POOL to False

2014-04-03 Thread berlin
** Summary changed: - LBaaS haproxy process still wok after setting admin_state_up of VIP to False + LBaaS haproxy process still wok after setting admin_state_up of VIP|POOL to False ** Changed in: neutron Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1302333] Re: LBaaS haproxy process still wok after setting admin_state_up of VIP|POOL to False

2014-04-03 Thread berlin
** Changed in: neutron Status: New => Invalid ** Summary changed: - LBaaS haproxy process still wok after setting admin_state_up of VIP|POOL to False + LBaaS haproxy process still wok after setting admin_state_up of VIP to False -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1302333] [NEW] LBaaS haproxy process still wok after setting admin_state_up of VIP|POOL to False

2014-04-03 Thread berlin
Public bug reported: I remember some one else reported the bug, but i didn't search it and not sure whether it is the same reason. So i report the bug here again. After deploying a LBaaS service(vip&pool&member&monitor) with haproxy, then set the admin_state_up of VIP|POLL to False, the haproxy s

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1302283] [NEW] LBaaS Haproxy occurs error if no member is added

2014-04-03 Thread berlin
Public bug reported: if VIP&Pool without one member added, the Haproxy agent would report config file error like the following: 2014-04-02 10:14:10.632 17283 DEBUG neutron.openstack.common.lockutils [req-18b873c4-abd7-4483-824f-f553c29ae549 None] Semaphore / lock released "deploy_instance" inne

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1298865] [NEW] NVP advanced service plugin should check router status before deploying a service

2014-03-28 Thread berlin
service. If the router is not in ACTIVE status, the service deployment request would return "Router not ready" error. ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Assignee: berlin (linb) Status: Confirmed ** Tags: nicira ** Changed in: neutron Assignee: (unassigned)

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1295494] [NEW] NVP service plugin should check advanced service in use before deleting a router

2014-03-20 Thread berlin
Public bug reported: When using NVP advanced service plugin, it should check whether there is service inserted into the router before deleting it. ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Assignee: berlin (linb) Status: New ** Tags: nicira ** Changed in: neutron

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1282366] [NEW] NVP FWaaS occurs error when create a firewall with no policy

2014-02-19 Thread berlin
, firewall) File "neutron/plugins/nicira/vshield/edge_firewall_driver.py", line 131, in _convert_firewall for rule in firewall['firewall_rule_list']: TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable }}} ** Affects: neutron Importance: Undecided Assignee:

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1255442] Re: VPNaaS Service driver should check whether router has gateway

2014-02-16 Thread berlin
It is the same bug with Bug #1258379 which has been resolved. ** Changed in: neutron Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: neutron Status: Fix Released => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subsc

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1271838] [NEW] neutron should provide available advanced services API

2014-01-23 Thread berlin
Public bug reported: I think it may be meaningful to expose available advanced services to users. For example: $neutron adv-service-list the command would show all available services in detail (service_type, service_provider, status, etc) for users including FW/VPN/LB. Users would have a clear k

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1261598] [NEW] VPNaaS doesn't consider subnet interface or router gateway removal operation

2013-12-16 Thread berlin
Public bug reported: I met one problem when fixing bug #1255442. On Routed service insertion implementation such as VPNaaS, there is router and subnet validation check before creating a vpnservice and also router in using check before deleting a router. But it did not consider subnet interface o