Re: Biweekly Xubuntu Meetings Discussion

2006-12-11 Thread Vincent
Fine with me, I'll be there as many Saturdays as possible (when my football match is early in the morning). On 12/10/06, Adam Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm in ... might be able to make both. -Adam On 12/10/06, Cody Somerville <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Alrighty, it has been a few

Re: Article

2006-12-11 Thread Vincent
On 12/10/06, Adam Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: majority of diggers are fanboys who spend too much time playing WoW to realize what's really going on. I totally agree, many even Digg things without looking at them :( -Adam On 12/10/06, Vincent < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lol, I had

Re: Murrine theme

2006-12-11 Thread Nikola Cakelic
On 05.12.2006 17:58, Vincent wrote: > Most Murrina* themes are either too bright or too plain IMO, I'll stick > with Clearlooks for the time being, but certainly use Murrine as default > if it's faster. If you like Clearlooks colors, and want to use it with Murrine GTK engine, have a look this the

Marketing

2006-12-11 Thread Joshua Gardner
Hello, At the last meeting Cody Somerville gave me a job in cooperation with other Ubuntu teams. I'm looking at the Marketing team right now and would like some input. To market Xubuntu Xubuntu needs an image. Some goals it wants to fill, how it fills them, and what's cool about Xubuntu. Both as

Re: Murrine theme

2006-12-11 Thread Jelle de Jong
The Theme looks great, Can we add some of those new themes to the new Xubuntu Herd? Nikola Cakelic wrote: > On 05.12.2006 17:58, Vincent wrote: >> Most Murrina* themes are either too bright or too plain IMO, I'll stick >> with Clearlooks for the time being, but certainly use Murrine as default >>

Re: Murrine theme

2006-12-11 Thread jmak
On 12/11/06, Jelle de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Theme looks great, > > Can we add some of those new themes to the new Xubuntu Herd? > > Nikola Cakelic wrote: > > On 05.12.2006 17:58, Vincent wrote: > >> Most Murrina* themes are either too bright or too plain IMO, I'll stick > >> with Cl