Hello Santhosh--
>
> @Gabriel : The percent deviation seems like a good indicator for most of
> the
> RDC values except those very small RDC values. I am not sure if thats the
> right metric over-all. In almost all the RDC's I am using, there seems to
> be
> 1-2 RDC's of thi
On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, santhu kumar wrote:
Hi Gabriel and Chales,
Thanks for the response.
@Gabriel : The percent deviation seems like a good indicator for most
of the RDC values except those very small RDC values. I am not sure if
thats the right metric over-all. In almost all the RDC's I a
Hi Gabriel and Chales,
Thanks for the response.
@Gabriel : The percent deviation seems like a good indicator for most of
the RDC values except those very small RDC values. I am not sure if thats
the right metric over-all. In almost all the RDC's I am using, there seems
to be 1-2 RDC's of this sma
Hello Santhosh--
>
> To find how good a refinement is, R-factors or Q-factor is used as a general
> broad indicator.
>
> R-factor defined as : sqrt{Sum[(Exp-obs)^2])/Sum[Exp^2]/2}
>
> This R-factor is a good indicator of the over-all data fit but is there any
> such
> indicator for residue w
The percent deviation carries some relevance because small RDCs (close
to magic angle) don't influence much the fitted alignment tensor and
they also have intrinsically larger experimental relative error.
On 11/13/2013 8:18 PM, santhu kumar wrote:
Hello Charles and others,
To find how good a
Hello Charles and others,
To find how good a refinement is, R-factors or Q-factor is used as a
general broad indicator.
R-factor defined as : sqrt{Sum[(Exp-obs)^2])/Sum[Exp^2]/2}
This R-factor is a good indicator of the over-all data fit but is there any
such indicator for residue wise improveme
