Re: XDrawPoint(s) etc MT safe?

2018-10-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 22:04:15 -0400 Dennis Clarke said: > On 10/16/2018 09:58 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > Dear Xorg : > > > >     Something I had not thought of came up today. Could multiple threads > > call XDrawPoint() and then XFlush() ?  Suppose sixteen threads are > > dispatched to do

Re: [RFC] Allow fd.o to join forces with X.Org

2018-10-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 08:17, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:49:24AM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote: > > + \item Support free and open source projects through the > > freedesktop.org > > + infrastructure. For projects outside the scope of item (\ref{1}) > > support > > +

Re: XDrawPoint(s) etc MT safe?

2018-10-17 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 22:04 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 10/16/2018 09:58 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > Dear Xorg : > > > > Something I had not thought of came up today. Could multiple threads > > call XDrawPoint() and then XFlush() ? Suppose sixteen threads are > > dispatched to do some

Re: XDrawPoint(s) etc MT safe?

2018-10-17 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 10/17/2018 05:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 22:04:15 -0400 Dennis Clarke said: On 10/16/2018 09:58 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: Dear Xorg :     Something I had not thought of came up today. Could multiple threads call XDrawPoint() and then XFlush() ?  S

Re: XDrawPoint(s) etc MT safe?

2018-10-17 Thread Dennis Clarke
Something I had not thought of came up today. Could multiple threads call XDrawPoint() and then XFlush() ? Suppose sixteen threads are dispatched to do some foo and each of them utters some XDrawPoint() calls and then XFlush()? Is that remotely thread safe? Sorry, assume XInitThreads