On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:58:37 +0700 Antoine Martin said:
> On 29/11/16 10:28, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:43:54 +0700 Antoine Martin
> > said:
> >
> >> On 29/11/16 07:57, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:03:17 -0500 Gene
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 01:04:23 -0500 Gene Heskett said:
> On Monday 28 November 2016 22:58:37 Antoine Martin wrote:
>
> > On 29/11/16 10:28, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:43:54 +0700 Antoine Martin
> said:
> > >> On 29/11/16 07:57, Carsten Haitzler (The Ras
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 23:40:45 -0800 Alan Coopersmith
said:
> On 11/28/16 07:58 PM, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > Even 100mbit is perfectly usable for remote access provided you use the
> > right tools and make some sacrifices. FYI: 4K@60 "fits" in H264 ~60Mbps.
> > But again, as I said above, just don
On 29/11/16 14:40, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 11/28/16 07:58 PM, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Even 100mbit is perfectly usable for remote access provided you use the
>> right tools and make some sacrifices. FYI: 4K@60 "fits" in H264 ~60Mbps.
>> But again, as I said above, just don't expect to handle
On 29/11/16 13:04, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2016 22:58:37 Antoine Martin wrote:
>
>> On 29/11/16 10:28, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:43:54 +0700 Antoine Martin
> said:
On 29/11/16 07:57, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> O
If you exclude the 4k fullscreen video use case - which is a worst case
scenario for remote display (there are tricks to deal with that too if
you are willing to make sacrifices), then screen updates are actually
much more manageable, even on a 1Gbps shared link.
>>>
>>> nope. n
On Tuesday 29 November 2016 02:40:45 Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 11/28/16 07:58 PM, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > Even 100mbit is perfectly usable for remote access provided you use
> > the right tools and make some sacrifices. FYI: 4K@60 "fits" in H264
> > ~60Mbps. But again, as I said above, just d
On Tuesday 29 November 2016 03:24:35 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:58:37 +0700 Antoine Martin
said:
[...]
> > http://xpra.org/
>
> xpra is its own display system effectively separate from x11. at least
> in terms of display as x11 protocol supports no forms of compression
> (l
On Tuesday 29 November 2016 04:18:09 Antoine Martin wrote:
> If you exclude the 4k fullscreen video use case - which is a
> worst case scenario for remote display (there are tricks to deal
> with that too if you are willing to make sacrifices), then screen
> updates are actuall
On 11/29/16 12:35 AM, Antoine Martin wrote:
On 29/11/16 14:40, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 11/28/16 07:58 PM, Antoine Martin wrote:
Even 100mbit is perfectly usable for remote access provided you use the
right tools and make some sacrifices. FYI: 4K@60 "fits" in H264 ~60Mbps.
But again, as I sai
On 29/11/16 18:52, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 November 2016 04:18:09 Antoine Martin wrote:
>
>> If you exclude the 4k fullscreen video use case - which is a
>> worst case scenario for remote display (there are tricks to deal
>> with that too if you are willing to make sacrific
On Tuesday 29 November 2016 13:48:07 Antoine Martin wrote:
> On 29/11/16 18:52, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2016 04:18:09 Antoine Martin wrote:
> >> If you exclude the 4k fullscreen video use case - which is a
> >> worst case scenario for remote display (there are tricks
On 11/28/2016 01:31 PM, Krzywicki, Alan wrote:
>
> So if I follow the XOpenDisplay sequence up the stack I see
> xcb_connect() / _/xcb_open/_abstract( ) trying to open
> “/tmp/.X11-unix/X0” with protocol set to 0. On one system it
> eventually calls select(), on another it uses poll() instead, so
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:59:26PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
root 797 0.0 1.9 271380 33600 tty7 Ssl+ 20:50
0:02 /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg -core :0 -seat
seat0 -auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt7 -novtswitch
gene 4114 0.0 0.0 5564 908 pts/8S+ 23:48 0:00
grep
On Tuesday 29 November 2016 03:39:51 Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:59:26PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >root 797 0.0 1.9 271380 33600 tty7 Ssl+ 20:50
> >0:02 /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg -core :0 -seat
> >seat0 -auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt7 -novtswitch
>
Greetings all;
I've no clue if any of you are familar with raspian, built for the armhf
SBC's..
I just installed it, and I am pleasantly surprised, it does almost
everything well, except:
When the mouse is moved, there is a huge lag, taking a fat second to move
the pointer to the new location
16 matches
Mail list logo
