On Monday, January 26, 2015 09:09:40 AM Egbert Eich wrote:
[snip]
> ==
> | PLEASE NOTE:
> | The memberships of all X.Org Members have been expired!
> | To participate in this election you MUST renew your membership
> | by the d
Richard Overstreet wrote:
> displaydata = (unsigned char *)calloc(ROWS*COLS*2, sizeof(unsigned char));
>
>
>
> Picture=XCreateImage(Monitor,DefaultVisual(Monitor,0),
> DefaultDepth(Monitor,0),
Is the display depth actually 16 bpp? If it's 32 bpp, the XPutImage
call will try to copy
Glynn,
We ended up patching the source as you recommended.
We were a little surprised to discover that tightening the umask or mode
prior to socket creation did not prevent others from connecting to Xvfb.
So our second approach was to compare the EUID of the Xvfb process with
the EUID of the
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Billy Wilson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about using Xvfb securely on a multi-user system. We are
> currently using xorg-x11-server-Xvfb-1.10.4-6.el6.x86_64. Our main reason
> for using Xvfb is to accommodate one of our users, whose scientific
> computing
Hello Vikas,
In genivi we stopped a active development on LayerManager also a X11 is not
widely used in the automotive.
The current way to go for us is a wayland compositor and we working on
implementing ilm API on top of weston.
Therefore there is no effort spent to realize you use-case, sor
Hi,
I am running GENIVI Layermanager (i.e. window manager and compositor based
on GLES2.0 and X11) which doesn't support multi-touch event (i.e.
Xi_TouchBegin, XI_TouchUpdate, XI_TouchEnd) handling and I have a
requirement to support X11 based application with multi-touch (i.e. pinch
and zoom use
On 01/27/15 08:16 AM, Roland Mainz wrote:
See Xsecurity(7) manual page... the SUN-DES-1 MIT-KERBEROS-5 and
ServerInterpreted auth (see $ xhost +si:localuser:root # example in
the man page, likely your preference if you only need Xvfb locally)
are user-to-user authentification mechanisms...
Thou
