Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem

2013-01-04 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 01/ 4/13 04:48 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > I'll 2nd that sentiment. I have had several occasions where I downloaded > the bzip2 and had to go back and get the .gz because whole directory trees > were missing from the unpacked archive. Once or twice I have pulled the > bzip2 a 2nd time, same m

Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem

2013-01-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 04 January 2013 12:27:11 Alan Coopersmith did opine: Message additions Copyright Friday 04 January 2013 by Gene Heskett > On 01/ 4/13 04:48 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I'll 2nd that sentiment. I have had several occasions where I > > downloaded the bzip2 and had to go back and get the .

Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem

2013-01-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 04 January 2013 07:41:56 Julien Cristau did opine: Message additions Copyright Friday 04 January 2013 by Gene Heskett > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 09:38:02 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > is there any particular reason we're still generating gz and bzip2? > > one should be enough, isn't it

Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem

2013-01-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 09:38:02 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > is there any particular reason we're still generating gz and bzip2? one > should be enough, isn't it? > I'm still using the gz tarballs, so I'd like to keep them if it's not too much trouble. Cheers, Julien _

Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem

2013-01-03 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 08:33:29AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:04:30PM -0700, Matt Dew wrote: > > > > What I didn't realize is that the new tarballs hadn't been uploaded to > > the server, rather the old ones were there. So the checksums didn't match. > > > > I unta

Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem

2012-12-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 08:33:29 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > Moreover gzip also adds the mtime of the compressed file to its > header, so even if you generate the same archive twice (whith the same > checksums before compression) you end up with 2 different files once > gzip'd. bzip2 doesn't in

Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem

2012-12-14 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:04:30PM -0700, Matt Dew wrote: > > What I didn't realize is that the new tarballs hadn't been uploaded to > the server, rather the old ones were there. So the checksums didn't match. > > I untarred both the tarballs on my local machine and the ones on the fdo > server.

Re: xorg-server 1.13.1, - checksum post-mortem

2012-12-14 Thread Matt Dew
All, I did a post-mortem to find out what happened. Here's what I believe to be the case. I had trouble with the release script last night. I ended up having to run it twice as I had a timeout problem during uploading to the server the first time. When I ran it the second time I had to manua