On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:05:03 -0500
Felix Miata wrote:
>Sent too soon, and probably to the wrong place. I tried equivlent
>xorg.conf files with Nvidia G84 and nouveau, and with ATI Cedar and
>radeon. Neither have any such shortcoming, so I have to suspect this
>should have gone to intel-gfx as a d
Thomas Lübking composed on 2016-02-10 09:49 (UTC+0100):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Sent too soon, and probably to the wrong place. I tried equivlent xorg.conf
>> files with Nvidia G84 and nouveau, and with ATI Cedar and radeon. Neither
>> have any such shortcoming, so I have to suspect this should h
On Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 08:05:03 CEST, Felix Miata wrote:
Sent too soon, and probably to the wrong place. I tried equivlent xorg.conf
files with Nvidia G84 and nouveau, and with ATI Cedar and radeon. Neither
have any such shortcoming, so I have to suspect this should have gone to
intel-gfx
Sent too soon, and probably to the wrong place. I tried equivlent xorg.conf
files with Nvidia G84 and nouveau, and with ATI Cedar and radeon. Neither
have any such shortcoming, so I have to suspect this should have gone to
intel-gfx as a driver bug. Anyone here agree, or know a config solution?
Fe
Using the following, I get the display positions the way I want them, but
the DPI I want is disregarded. If I comment the primary option line, DPI
is obeyed, but the wrong display is primary. Am I doing something wrong,
missing something, is a ServerLayout section required, or is there a bug
here?
