On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 14:24 -0400, David Jackson wrote:
> Is the plan to keep Xvfb as-is (KDrive?)
As-is, yes. Strictly speaking, Xvfb is not a kdrive server, in the same
sense that Xorg is not a kdrive server. There was a very similar kdrive
server named Xfake, and that was indeed deleted.
> Any
Is the plan to keep Xvfb as-is (KDrive?) or to move it to a wrapper around
Xorg+Dummy? Any ideas about why the dummy driver was not working (killing
the headless dummy X server brings down any X server running on hardware,
like the dummy X server somehow gets entangled with other X servers on the
s
On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 16:45 -0400, David Jackson wrote:
> I have been a using xvfb for quite a while because I use it for a
> headless setup with x11vnc connecting to it. I became greatly
> concerned when I heard xvfb will be removed.
Your concerns are unwarranted. Xvfb isn't going away.
- ajax
_
I have been a using xvfb for quite a while because I use it for a headless
setup with x11vnc connecting to it. I became greatly concerned when I heard
xvfb will be removed. xvfb has worked perfectly for me so that this
workable solution for a headless server being changed is concerning.
First, if
