Lyude Paul writes:
> Hi, I saw this and had a couple questions. When you say "wayland compatibility
> layer" I assumed at first this was for some reason a duplicate of nested
> compositors but I think I may have misunderstood. Is this basically the
> opposite of Xwayland, e.g. allowing X to act a
Hi, I saw this and had a couple questions. When you say "wayland compatibility
layer" I assumed at first this was for some reason a duplicate of nested
compositors but I think I may have misunderstood. Is this basically the
opposite of Xwayland, e.g. allowing X to act as a wayland compositor with
t
