Re: Remote OpenGL -- getting it to work?

2016-06-11 Thread Antoine Martin
On 11/06/16 12:30, L. A. Walsh wrote: > Antoine Martin wrote: >> On 11/06/16 01:02, L. A. Walsh wrote: >> >>> Antoine Martin wrote: >>> >> .0 NVIDIA 355.98) >> FWIW: xpra + virtualgl works very well and is often considerably faster than doing GL over a remot

Re: Remote OpenGL -- getting it to work?

2016-06-10 Thread L. A. Walsh
Antoine Martin wrote: On 11/06/16 01:02, L. A. Walsh wrote: Antoine Martin wrote: .0 NVIDIA 355.98) FWIW: xpra + virtualgl works very well and is often considerably faster than doing GL over a remote display connection. More info here: https://xpra.org/trac/wiki/Usage

Re: Remote OpenGL -- getting it to work?

2016-06-10 Thread Antoine Martin
On 11/06/16 01:02, L. A. Walsh wrote: > Antoine Martin wrote: .0 NVIDIA 355.98) >>> >> FWIW: xpra + virtualgl works very well and is often considerably faster >> than doing GL over a remote display connection. More info here: >> https://xpra.org/trac/wiki/Usage/OpenGL >> > --- >

Re: Remote OpenGL -- getting it to work?

2016-06-10 Thread L. A. Walsh
Antoine Martin wrote: .0 NVIDIA 355.98) FWIW: xpra + virtualgl works very well and is often considerably faster than doing GL over a remote display connection. More info here: https://xpra.org/trac/wiki/Usage/OpenGL --- Will have to try that -- not sure if xpra is supported by the c

Re: Remote OpenGL -- getting it to work?

2016-06-01 Thread Antoine Martin
On 01/06/16 05:13, Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:33:14AM -0700, L. A. Walsh wrote: >> Glynn Clements wrote: >>> L. A. Walsh wrote: >>> I have sometimes gotten some GLX programs to work for a short while, but more often than not, I don't get them to work at all. >>> >>

Re: Remote OpenGL -- getting it to work?

2016-05-31 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:33:14AM -0700, L. A. Walsh wrote: Glynn Clements wrote: L. A. Walsh wrote: I have sometimes gotten some GLX programs to work for a short while, but more often than not, I don't get them to work at all. The most likely reason for this is that the program needs a lat

Re: Remote OpenGL -- getting it to work?

2016-05-31 Thread L. A. Walsh
Glynn Clements wrote: L. A. Walsh wrote: I have sometimes gotten some GLX programs to work for a short while, but more often than not, I don't get them to work at all. The most likely reason for this is that the program needs a later version of OpenGL than Cygwin's X server provides.

Re: Remote OpenGL -- getting it to work?

2016-05-31 Thread Glynn Clements
L. A. Walsh wrote: > I have sometimes gotten some GLX programs to work for a short while, > but more often than not, I don't get them to work at all. The most likely reason for this is that the program needs a later version of OpenGL than Cygwin's X server provides. > I'm not sure where to look

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Cook, Rich
> On May 27, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia > wrote: > > >> On May 27, 2016, at 09:27, Cook, Rich wrote: >> >> >>> On May 27, 2016, at 1:53 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia >>> wrote: >>> Another awkward thing about this, I suppose, is that on OSX the X server is star

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> On May 27, 2016, at 09:27, Cook, Rich wrote: > > >> On May 27, 2016, at 1:53 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia >> wrote: >> >>> Another awkward thing about this, I suppose, is that on OSX the X server >>> is started implicitly on demand and there's no reasonable way to configure >>> things lik

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Cook, Rich
Thanks for the pointer to the actual change. The commit message there also says, wrongly, "Almost every situation of someone running indirect GLX is a mistake that results in X Server crashes. Indirect GLX is the cause of regular security vulnerabilities, and rarely provides any capability to

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 05/27/16 11:20 AM, Cook, Rich wrote: I'm glad to hear that one of the core X server maintainer is saying that it is not going "completely" away. The previous statement on IGLX when it was disabled was: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=d0da0e9c3bb8fe0cd4879ecb24d21715bfaa

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Cook, Rich
I'm glad to hear that one of the core X server maintainer is saying that it is not going "completely" away. Also that he is adding an xorg.conf option to enable IGLX. Great news! We can rest easier. I could not for the life of me understand how this could be removed, but that was the informa

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Alan Coopersmith
You do know that Adam is one of the core X server maintainers, right? If he says you're wrong, then I believe him and you should too. (Though the mail he points to says you're only half wrong - yes it is disabled by default today, but no, we've not announced any plans to make it completely go awa

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Christopher Barry
On Fri, 27 May 2016 09:54:28 -0700 Alan Coopersmith wrote: >On 05/26/16 06:56 PM, Christopher Barry wrote: >> I have certain software that must use opengl, and it runs on >> windows. I had to stand up a separate box just for that application, >> as I run Linux everywhere else. I could not make it

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 05/26/16 06:56 PM, Christopher Barry wrote: I have certain software that must use opengl, and it runs on windows. I had to stand up a separate box just for that application, as I run Linux everywhere else. I could not make it work in a KVM VM due to no opengl capability in KVM (I won't use vmw

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Cook, Rich
> On May 27, 2016, at 1:53 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia > wrote: > >> Another awkward thing about this, I suppose, is that on OSX the X server >> is started implicitly on demand and there's no reasonable way to configure >> things like command line options. > > Most of those are configured vi

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-27 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> On May 26, 2016, at 15:56, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 09:14 +0200, Laurent Lamalle wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have just discovered, through the x11-us...@lists.apple.com mailing >> list, that Xorg deprecated some software component (IGLX?) necessary for >> remote OpenGL viewi

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-26 Thread Christopher Barry
On Thu, 26 May 2016 21:56:21 -0400 Christopher Barry wrote: >On Thu, 26 May 2016 23:43:05 + >"Cook, Rich" wrote: > >>The point here is that today it is being *disabled* and in the future >>it is completely *going away.* Anyone care to argue with that? I'd >>love to be wrong about it. >>

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-26 Thread Christopher Barry
On Thu, 26 May 2016 23:43:05 + "Cook, Rich" wrote: >The point here is that today it is being *disabled* and in the future >it is completely *going away.* Anyone care to argue with that? I'd >love to be wrong about it. > >> On May 26, 2016, at 3:56 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-26 Thread Cook, Rich
The point here is that today it is being *disabled* and in the future it is completely *going away.* Anyone care to argue with that? I'd love to be wrong about it. > On May 26, 2016, at 3:56 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 09:14 +0200, Laurent Lamalle wrote: >> Hello, >>

Re: Remote OpenGL

2016-05-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 09:14 +0200, Laurent Lamalle wrote: > Hello, > > I have just discovered, through the x11-us...@lists.apple.com mailing > list, that Xorg deprecated some software component (IGLX?) necessary for > remote OpenGL viewing. As I just said: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/