On 7/13/20 4:12 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
I had a report against #357 yesterday; it's been obsoleted by #358.
That's what I figured.
(I'm working on a different program for the next few weeks, and
delaying a fix for something like this wouldn't be responsive).
I'm replying for completeness a
On 7/13/20 1:59 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
There's always bugs to investigate, but a regression (new bug) really
ought to be fixed first.
To be clear, 356 worked, 357 failed, 358 works.
Do you still want a bug against 357? Or is it now obsolete?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
smime.p7s
Descr
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 01:49:03PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 7/13/20 1:59 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > There's always bugs to investigate, but a regression (new bug) really
> > ought to be fixed first.
>
> To be clear, 356 worked, 357 failed, 358 works.
>
> Do you still want a bug against 3
On 7/12/20 5:31 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Patch #358 - 2020/07/12
xterm-358 is working better than 357 did for me.
I tried 357 a few days ago and had problems, but wasn't able to dig into
it to find out why they were happening.
It seemed as if xterm wasn't acknow
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:39:45PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 7/12/20 5:31 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > Patch #358 - 2020/07/12
>
> xterm-358 is working better than 357 did for me.
>
> I tried 357 a few days ago and had problems, but wasn't able to dig into it
>
