Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-02-04 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 11:11:55AM +0100, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote: > > >thanks, you're right, this is a bug. I've just sent out the patch reverting > >the commit - since it was supposed to only clean up code but not include any > >functional changes, this is the simpler way than trying to fix a

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-02-04 Thread Mathieu Taillefumier
thanks, you're right, this is a bug. I've just sent out the patch reverting the commit - since it was supposed to only clean up code but not include any functional changes, this is the simpler way than trying to fix a patch that's just cosmetic anyway. Yes but the initial idea is good and the

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-02-04 Thread Peter Hutterer
include any functional changes, this is the simpler way than trying to fix a patch that's just cosmetic anyway. thanks for the debugging, much appreciated! Cheers, Peter > > regards > > Mathieu > > > - Mail original - > De: "Peter Hutterer" >

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-02-03 Thread mathieu . taillefumier
e: "Peter Hutterer" À: "Mathieu Taillefumier" Cc: "Jeremy Huddleston" , xorg@lists.x.org, "Keith Packard" Envoyé: Jeudi 2 Février 2012 18:43:27 Objet: Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2 On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:00:58PM +0100, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-02-03 Thread Mathieu Taillefumier
On 02/02/2012 06:43 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:00:58PM +0100, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote: On 01/31/2012 07:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: That's pretty much an entire merge you are blaming now. Are you sure you can't narrow it down further than that? If you're ha

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-02-02 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:00:58PM +0100, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote: > On 01/31/2012 07:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > >That's pretty much an entire merge you are blaming now. Are you sure you > >can't narrow it down further than that? If you're having a build failure, > >just apply the fix

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-02-02 Thread Mathieu Taillefumier
On 01/31/2012 07:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: That's pretty much an entire merge you are blaming now. Are you sure you can't narrow it down further than that? If you're having a build failure, just apply the fix at each step rather than doing a 'git skip' ... Sorry for the delay. The bis

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-01-31 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
That's pretty much an entire merge you are blaming now. Are you sure you can't narrow it down further than that? If you're having a build failure, just apply the fix at each step rather than doing a 'git skip' ... On Jan 31, 2012, at 6:05 AM, Mathieu Taillefumier wrote: > Hello, > > thank y

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-01-31 Thread Mathieu Taillefumier
Hello, thank you for the answer. On 01/31/2012 12:28 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: I really don't see how 2abe83df686ed64c4f4df711ac3c1fd12131c2e4 could be the culprit. It's trivial. I made a mistake somewhere so to double check I did the bisection again starting from 1.11.99.1 (working) to 1

Re: [BUG] xinput bug in Xorg 1.12-rc2

2012-01-30 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
I really don't see how 2abe83df686ed64c4f4df711ac3c1fd12131c2e4 could be the culprit. It's trivial. Can you please create a bug report at http://bugs.freedesktop.org to track this? On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:59 AM, mathieu.taillefum...@free.fr wrote: > Hello, > > i encounter a bug in the last rc o