baldu...@units.it writes:
> Forgive my ignorance: am I missing some relevant piece of sw here? Or
> the new protocol header you mention comes w/ this new version of the
> server? Or something else...?
The new headers haven't been released yet; hoping to get to that today.
--
keith.pack...@intel
> I've posted a patch that disables these requests when the new protocol
> header isn't available.
>
thanks a lot: it builds fine now
Forgive my ignorance: am I missing some relevant piece of sw here? Or
the new protocol header you mention comes w/ this new version of the
server? Or something e
baldu...@units.it writes:
> In file included from ../include/dixstruct.h:28:0,
> from shm.c:44:
> shm.c: In function 'ProcShmAttachFd':
> shm.c:1102:13: error: unknown type name 'xShmAttachFdReq'
> REQUEST(xShmAttachFdReq);
> ^
> ... [
hello
> Here's the first 1.15 release candidate. I think I got all of the new
> work that people have proposed for 1.15 included. If I've missed
> something that has been reviewed and is ready for 1.15, please let me
> know; it's been a bit more active than usual this week.
>
> Remember that thi
