Weird behaviour (most X extensions missing including GLX) in X11 forwarding since xorg-server 1.20 ...

2019-08-21 Thread Stefan Dirsch
XC-MISC default screen number:0 When running xdpyinfo local (DISPLAY=:0) it's complete: [...] number of extensions:29 BIG-REQUESTS Composite DAMAGE DOUBLE-BUFFER DPMS DRI2 DRI3 GLX Generic Event Extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER MIT-SHM

Re: Fwd: Indirect GLX still broken

2018-06-14 Thread Ilya Anfimov
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 06:02:07AM +0100, Steve Dodd wrote: >On 12 June 2018 at 10:45, Ilya Anfimov wrote: > > The GLX pathway had too many data copy-ing, that process wass > > too CPU-based and sycnhronous, also it had some optimisations > >of pa

Fwd: Fwd: Indirect GLX still broken

2018-06-13 Thread Steve Dodd
On 12 June 2018 at 10:45, Ilya Anfimov wrote: > The GLX pathway had too many data copy-ing, that process wass too CPU-based and sycnhronous, also it had some optimisations of packing and pipelining drawcalls in one write() syscall, [..] I was thinking about this .. what happened to

Re: Fwd: Indirect GLX still broken

2018-06-12 Thread Ilya Anfimov
med synchronizations. It was barely compatible with 20-year old code of sockets-based in- terprocess comuncation. The GLX pathway had too many data copy- ing, that process wass too CPU-based and sycnhronous, also it had some optimisations of packing and pipelining drawcalls in one write() syscall,

Fwd: Indirect GLX still broken

2018-06-12 Thread Steve Dodd
On 12 June 2018 at 10:08, Ilya Anfimov wrote: > > No, currently there is no developers willing to improve this. > However, you can try some proxies like virtualgl. > Is there any understanding of the root of the problem? In theory I could start looking into it, but I'm old and ill and very out

Re: Indirect GLX still broken

2018-06-12 Thread Ilya Anfimov
d I would at least like to test/benchmark >performance with indirect GLX (I have turned it on in xorg.conf) >I am using the modesetting driver, but think I have also seen this on the >old intel driver too (I can retest that if useful, but obviously >modesetting is now

Indirect GLX still broken

2018-06-12 Thread Steve Dodd
ashioned X Terminal - but it does have a 3D-accelerated chipset and I would at least like to test/benchmark performance with indirect GLX (I have turned it on in xorg.conf) I am using the modesetting driver, but think I have also seen this on the old intel driver too (I can retest that if useful, but

Question about Xdmx GLX proxy status

2017-11-02 Thread Raimonds Cicans
Hi. TL;DR I started playing with Xdmx, but it crashes on any OpenGL application (even glxinfo). So I want to ask what is Xdmx GLX proxy status? Is it badly broken or I have hope? Long version: Xdmx crashes on any OpenGL application. Tested versions: 1.19.5 and GIT Cause: variable

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-14 Thread Long Vu
if this will help, but previously adam had said: >> > >> > > How are you launching Xvfb? I believe it defaults to 8bpp, but >> > > GLX >> > only >> > > works at 16 or 32bpp. >> > >> > which I think you hadn't tried yet. >> &

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Eric Gunther
you launching Xvfb? I believe it defaults to 8bpp, but > > > GLX > > only > > > works at 16 or 32bpp. > > > > which I think you hadn't tried yet. > > > > Well I did with > > xvfb-run -s '-screen 0 1024x768x24 +extension GLX +iglx&#x

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Antoine Martin
t;>> "-nolisten tcp") to pass to the Xvfb >>>>>> server >>>>>> (default: "-screen 0 640x480x8") >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not familiar wi

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Long Vu
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Eric Gunther wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 13:51 -0500, Long Vu wrote: > > I don't know if this will help, but previously adam had said: > >> How are you launching Xvfb? I believe it defaults to 8bpp, but GLX > only >> works at 16

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Roland Mainz
the Xvfb >>>>> server >>>>> (default: "-screen 0 640x480x8") >>>>> >>>>> I am not familiar with X server options, what server args I would need >>>>> to get rid of this "ES2 P

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Eric Gunther
; > > (default: "-screen 0 > > > > 640x480x8") > > > > > > > > I am not familiar with X server options, what server args I > > > > would need > > > > to get rid of this "ES2 Prism: E

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Antoine Martin
0x480x8") >>>> >>>> I am not familiar with X server options, what server args I would need >>>> to get rid of this "ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported" >>>> error? >>> >>> Yes, I think it would be: >>

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Long Vu
arguments (other than server number and >>> "-nolisten tcp") to pass to the Xvfb >>> server >>> (default: "-screen 0 640x480x8") >>> >>> I am not familiar with X se

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Long Vu
"-nolisten tcp") to pass to the Xvfb >> server >> (default: "-screen 0 640x480x8") >> >> I am not familiar with X server options, what server args I would need >> to get rid of this "ES2 Prism: Error - GL

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Adam Jackson
to the Xvfb > server > (default: "-screen 0 640x480x8") > > I am not familiar with X server options, what server args I would need > to get rid of this "ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported" > error? Yes, I think it would be: xvfb-run -

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Long Vu
gt;>> We got this error with Xvfb that we do not have when we were running a >>> real VNC server just to provide X. >>> >>> ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported >>>GLX version 1.3 or higher is required >>> Xlib: extension "RAND

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Long Vu
ning a >> real VNC server just to provide X. >> >> ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported >>GLX version 1.3 or higher is required >> Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":99". >> >> Is there something we can do to avoid

Re: How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 14:09 -0500, Long Vu wrote: > Hi, > > We use Xvfb to avoid having to run an X server on our build machine. > > We got this error with Xvfb that we do not have when we were running a > real VNC server just to provide X. > > ES2 Prism: Error - GLX ex

How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-12 Thread Long Vu
Hi, We use Xvfb to avoid having to run an X server on our build machine. We got this error with Xvfb that we do not have when we were running a real VNC server just to provide X. ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported GLX version 1.3 or higher is required Xlib: extension "

How to avoid this Xvfb error: ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported

2016-12-11 Thread Long Vu
Hi, We use Xvfb to avoid having to run an X server on our build machine. We got this error with Xvfb that we do not have when we were running a real VNC server just to provide X. ES2 Prism: Error - GLX extension is not supported GLX version 1.3 or higher is required Xlib: extension "

GLX

2016-05-27 Thread John Allison
Hi I need GLX in my work - radiation modelling in particle physics, nuclear physics, medicine (radiation therapy) and spacecraft design. Radiation modelling takes lots of remote CPU and we display results locally via X11 with GLX using relatively low bandwidth. Using Quartz on Mac. John

Re: OpenGL GLX extension not supported by display ':0'

2014-05-11 Thread ashish yadav
Hi, After installing some pacakges, like: libdrm* mesa* libgl* libdricore* libglapi* xserver-xorg-extension-glx* Celestia Test Pass. Thanks On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Freitag, 9. Mai 2014 07:18:36 CEST, ashish yadav wrote: > >> Hi, >> >

Re: OpenGL GLX extension not supported by display ':0'

2014-05-09 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Freitag, 9. Mai 2014 07:18:36 CEST, ashish yadav wrote: Hi, Please let me know if you need more info. "The Silicon Motion SM712 is a PCI-based 2D graphics engine with 4MB of embedded video memory and a maximum output resolution of 1280x1024" -> plug a reasonable GPU card into the box and

Re: OpenGL GLX extension not supported by display ':0'

2014-05-09 Thread ashish yadav
: > > sh-4.2# /opt/lsb/appbat/bin/celestia > freeglut (/opt/lsb/appbat/bin/celestia): OpenGL GLX extension not supported by > display ':0' > sh-4.2# > > sh-4.2# glxinfo > name of display: :0 > Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual or fbconfig > sh-4.2#

OpenGL GLX extension not supported by display ':0'

2014-05-08 Thread ashish yadav
Hi , I am doing LSB Certification Test on My System (x86_64 system Sandy Bridge). While Doing Manual Test Celestia, I got following error: sh-4.2# /opt/lsb/appbat/bin/celestia freeglut (/opt/lsb/appbat/bin/celestia): OpenGL GLX extension not supported by display ':0' sh-4.2# sh-4.