On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 01:22:47AM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2012, at 15:13, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:10:47PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:04 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 05, 20
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:10:47PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:04 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:03:44PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> On Jun 5, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>> I agree w
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:03:44PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Take libXi for example, since it's probably fresh in most of our minds.
> >> With Xi2, libXi added a ton of new functionality and remained backwar
[Side note: your mails show up with ridiculously long uwrapped lines,
which makes them harder to reply to.]
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:37:45AM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Jeremy Huddles
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:52:51PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >>> On Mo
re removing a fringe API that is only used internally, then I'd argue
> against SONAME change.
Only if you know for sure that it won't break any real applications; in
other words, does this represent de-facto public API, or not?
- Josh Triplett
