The DITA spec says: "Each glossary entry topic defines a
single sense of one term ... ". See
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata02/os/complete/part2-tech-content/archSpec/technicalContent/dita-glossary-topic.html#glossaryArch
. This is sufficient for us to call a "glossary entry".
What is the basis for presenting 'glossentry' as 'glossary entry'? Why
not call it a 'gloss entry'? Does the DITA spec say anything about this?
This is perhaps a nerdy detail. But anyway: In the English localization
of the DITA addon for XMLmind XML Editor, as well as in “DITA for the
impatien
2 matches
Mail list logo
