Hello,
I am working on a project where we are using either libxslt or xalan for xslt
transformations.
We have internally deprecated xalan because libxslt is considerably faster, and
all other xml processing is performed by libxml2.
We now would like to drop xalan completely, but there is one impo
> Your approach is way too heavy, instead of changing < and & in all case
> detecting the full
> construct first and then special processing those case is really less
> disruptive. With that
> approach no other test case in libxml2 or libxslt fails. So I commited that
> restricted approach
Hello,
I recently came up with an issue that prevented the generation of server side
includes.
Daniel Veillard wrote a patch in version 2.9.0 to help resolve this:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/libxml2/diff/?id=7d4c529a334845621e2f805c8ed0e154b3350cec
The issue was that too much escaping was perfo
Hello,
Following Daniel's message about a new release, I would like to bump the
issue/patch I raised earlier this month for consideration.
Thank you,
Romain Bondue
> Hello,
> I recently came up with an issue that prevented the generation of server side
> includes.
> Daniel Veillard wrote a patc
> Ah, right, I looked at your patch last week-end briefly, but your patch
> didn't apply to git head (even after removing all the spurious \r due to your
> Windows environment), I started looking at what was going on, but got
> interrupted.
>
> You could help by reposing a rebased, cleaned
Hello,
> I want to generate a XML like the following , In this example root element
> Envelope having
> namespace prefix as "S11" . How to add the namespace prefix to the Root
> Element. In my code below
> I have simply given Root element name as "S11:Envelope", I know it is wrong,
> Please let
Hello,
The link to the < nice documentation > of the SAX interface is broken on this
page : http://www.xmlsoft.org/interface.html
Regards,
Romain Bondue
_
Ce message et ses p
Hello,
Thank you for this release, but you did not include my last patch related to
the generation of server side processing instruction. Is it an oversight, or is
there something wrong with it?
Thank you,
Romain Bondue
___
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:26:09AM +0200, rbondue@orange.com wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Thank you for this release, but you did not include my last patch related to
>> the generation of
>> server side processing instruction. Is it an oversight, or is there
>> something wrong with it?
> Daniel Ve
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:26:09AM +0200, rbondue@orange.com wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Thank you for this release, but you did not include my last patch
>> related to the generation of server side processing instruction. Is it an
>> oversight, or is there something wrong with it?
> Daniel Veill
Hello,
I'm bringing my patch up again so that it can hopefully be included in the next
version. It should applied cleanly to the git trunk.
Thank you and regards,
Romain Bondue
P.S : Sorry about the, automatically added, legal garbage bellow, there is no
way I can prevent it from creeping int
Hello,
> Second, I don't know how to obtain the text after element which
> still belongs to element. s there a way to do so ?
It is my understanding that this is what xmlNodeGetContent() is for. Just
remember that you will have to free the string returned.
Regards,
Romain Bondue
___
Hello,
On page http://xmlsoft.org/interface.html, the link to James Henstridge's nice
SAX documentation seems dead.
Google found this one:
http://www.jamesh.id.au/articles/libxml-sax/libxml-sax.html
Hope that helps,
Romain Bondue
_
13 matches
Mail list logo