s with external
entities.
> Q: is it Solaris XML man page incorrect or is it xsltproc bug or
> maybe this kind pages must look diffrent ?
Not a bug in xsltproc. Fix your XML file. :)
Tom
--
Thomas Schraitle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
xm
Hi,
On Friday 22 April 2005 09:55, you wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> [...]
> > Not a bug in xsltproc. Fix your XML file. :)
>
> OK.. but how ? :)
> In case Solaris DOCTYPE is in man page with inclution and in
> included file.
> Is it mean Solar
Hi,
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> [..]
> > Hope that helps.
>
> Thank you. I'll try above.
>
> Sorry but I'm still interested answer on quesion about Solaris XML
> man pan pages correctnes :)
Sorry, but I don't know.
> More detai
Hi
for version 12.x, the oXygen XML editor implemented a new W3C's processing
instruction (PI) named xml-model[1]. An example file could look like this:
--8<--
http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"; version="5.0">
Test
Test
--8<--
Hi Daniel,
Sunday 05 June 2011
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:18:55PM +0200, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> [...]
> > However, using xmllint gives me the following error:
> not an error, it's a warning !
Ok, badly formulated you're right. :)
> [...]
> http://git.
e work in progress.)
Yes, it would be super-cool to have that in xsltproc as well. Especially as
the trend goes from XSLT1.0 to XSLT2.0. However, I know, this is not trivial
at all.
--
Gruß/Regards
Thomas Schraitle
___
xml mailing list, project
east it
was so some time ago. Maybe that has changed now.
Try jing and validate your document against the DocBook RNG schema. If
jing doesn't complain, blame libxml2. :)
I would also see more support for RELAX NG in libxml2, but that's
beyond my abilities, unfortunately.
--
Gruß/
R/xinclude-11
--
Gruß/Regards,
Thomas Schraitle
___
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
