Hi!
I think that something is broken in the way libxml2 handles step
4.7 of the RELAXNG simplification process.
Say that we have the following RELAXNG grammars.
a.rng:
http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0";>
b.rng:
http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0";>
Hi!
Given the following input RELAX NG grammar:
http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0";
datatypeLibrary="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes";>
and the following input document a.xml:
c
xmllint reports:
a.xml:1: element a: Relax-NG validi
Hi!
This has been fixed in merge request #10:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/merge_requests/10
along with some other RELAX NG issues that I found as well.
Nikolai
Nikolai Weibull, 2018-09-07 20:49:
I think that something is broken in the way libxml2 handles step
4.7
of the RELAXNG
Hi!
This remains unfixed. I have absolutely no idea what’s going on
in the interleave validation code. Daniel, could you please put
together some minor documentation on how the interleave validation
code works? It’s very complicated.
Thank you,
Nikolai
Nikolai Weibull, 2018-09-09 21:26
Hi!
OK, I managed to decode it somewhat. The issue seems to be that
we build groups of what can be matched by the interleave, but that
these groups don’t include data, list, and value elements, only
element and text elements. This patch extends
xmlRelaxNGGetElements so that it can return th
Hi!
I’m trying to do something like the following:
a.xml:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; href="b.xml"
xpointer="xpointer(*/*)"/>
b.xml:
and then
% xmllint --xinclude a.xml
This, however, doesn’t render the output I was expecting, namely
but rather
That is, t
Hi!
Stefan Behnel, 2018-11-23 21:54:
I think something changed in the RelaxNG code.
Yes, it seems that my patch for data in interleaves was added and
this may be the cause of these issues. The regression tests
didn’t display them, so this is something different. Could we
perhaps get a mi
Hi!
Daniel Veillard via xml, 2018-11-22 18:32:
I have just tagged the Release Candidate 1 in git and pushed a
signed
tarball and signed rpms to the usual place:
Could we please get merge request 10 into
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/merge_requests/10
this release? It fixes
Hi!
Daniel Veillard, 2018-11-24 14:01:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:14:06AM +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Daniel Veillard via xml, 2018-11-22 18:32:
> I have just tagged the Release Candidate 1 in git and
> pushed a
> signed
> tarball and signed rpms to the usual place:
Could we please
Hi!
Stefan Behnel, 2018-11-25 15:37:
Nikolai Weibull schrieb am 24.11.18 um 00:12:
Yes, it seems that my patch for data in interleaves was added
and this may be the cause of these issues. The regression tests
didn’t display them, so this is something different. Could we
perhaps get a minim
(cur->type == XML_RELAXNG_VALUE))) {
return (1);
}
Stefan Behnel, 2018-11-30 08:48:
Daniel Veillard schrieb am 29.11.18 um 21:20:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:48:37AM +0100, Nikolai Weibull via
xml wrote:
Stefan Behnel, 2018-11-25 15:37:
Nikolai Weibull sc
Hi!
Stefan Behnel, 2018-12-24 11:43:
Nick Wellnhofer schrieb am 19.12.18 um 17:02:
On 30/11/2018 11:41, Nikolai Weibull via xml wrote:
OK, now I understand why it was working in my copy of the
repository and
not yours. Something went wrong when you applied the patch,
Daniel, as a
line was
Hi!
The following RELAX NG schema requires exponential running time when matching
attributes (15 attributes is where my computer begins to show the symptoms,
this may vary with your set-up):
a.rng:
http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0";>
a
a
b
c
13 matches
Mail list logo
