Hi there,
I noticed that libxml2 2.6.28 was released month but I cannot see a
tag corresponding to the release in the Subversion repository. Is
this intentional or was its creation simply overlooked?
Kind regards,
Mark Rowe
___
xml mailing list
27;s a bit different than the CVS approach, but
straightforward once you get used to it.
- Mark
On 29/05/2007, at 12:22 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:12:43PM +1000, Mark Rowe wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I noticed that libxml2 2.6.28 was released
On 29/05/2007, at 1:00 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:29:55AM +1000, Mark Rowe wrote:
>> Daniel,
>>
>> It's as simple as:
>> svn cp -rREV http://svn.gnome.org/svn/libxml2/trunk
>> http://svn.gnome.org/svn/libxml/tags/TAG_NAM
On 29/05/2007, at 1:22 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Hum, apparently I don't have the rigt to do that, weird ...
>
> paphio:~/XML -> svn cp -r3601 http://svn.gnome.org/svn/libxml2/trunk
> http://svn.gnome.org/svn/libxml2/tags/LIBXML2_2_6_28
> svn: MKACTIVITY of '/svn/libxml2/!svn/act/
> a99709b
Hi Daniel,
It would be great if you could tag this release (and that of
libxslt-1.1.22) in SVN for ease of reference in the future.
Thanks,
Mark Rowe
On 24/08/2007, at 01:34, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> few serious bugs have been fixed so it was a reasonnable time for a
> r
On 24/08/2007, at 02:31, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:17:12AM +1000, Mark Rowe wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> It would be great if you could tag this release (and that of
>> libxslt-1.1.22) in SVN for ease of reference in the future.
>
> I nee
anges to allow this. I'll send you a copy
shortly that you can take the relevant snippet from.
Kind regards,
Mark Rowe
___
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
sions of Mac
OS X, one has 460 and the other 400.
Could you clarify what you mean by this? I'm not advocating that ICU
be the default, I'm just curious why you feel vendors should not use
it if it is present.
Thanks,
Mark Rowe
___
ne in other browsers fail in
browsers
based on WebKit. That's because libxml2 discards empty CDATA
sections.
I filed this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514181
And Mark Rowe attached a patch that resolves the issue.
Daniel pointed out that some clients of libx
the complete list of all such numeric entities that can be
found in various HTML documents that aren't in standard but
nevertheless are understood by browsers?
Based on the specification, the complete list of numeric character
references would be equivalent to the complete l
On 2009-07-10, at 10:53, Giovanni Donelli wrote:
Hi Daniel,
thanks for the response. I did some additional debugging and I
verified that the crash doesn't occur on the main thread, but is
100% reproducible on secondary thread. This explains why you cannot
reproduce it with xmllint.
On 2010-11-08, at 08:40, James Wright wrote:
> I tried to install libxml2 yesterday for a Ruby side project of mine.
> First I tried it with MacPorts but my MacPorts wouldn't work so I tried to
> download the source for libxml2 and "make" the install which ran with some
> errors but nothing tha
On 2010-11-09, at 07:37, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:01:02AM -0800, Mark Rowe wrote:
>>
>> On 2010-11-08, at 08:40, James Wright wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to install libxml2 yesterday for a Ruby side project of mine.
> [...]
>>> Aft
On 2010-11-10, at 00:45, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:50:23PM -0800, Mark Rowe wrote:
>>
>> On 2010-11-09, at 07:37, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:01:02AM -0800, Mark Rowe wrote:
>>>> Based on your des
On 2012-03-15, at 23:41, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:48:01PM -0700, Joshua Alexander wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I recently built libxml2 2.7.8 on OS X and now apache won't start saying
>> "libphp5.so requires version 10.0.0 or later, but libxml2.2.dylib provides
>> versio
On 2012-03-15, at 17:48, Joshua Alexander wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I recently built libxml2 2.7.8 on OS X and now apache won't start saying
> "libphp5.so requires version 10.0.0 or later, but libxml2.2.dylib provides
> version 9.0.0"
>
> That doesn't make sense to me, so I'm curious, is what a
On 2013-10-24, at 2:18 AM, Frank Gross wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've build an executable using libxml2.8.0 via a dlopen on a Mac OS 10.8
> system. But when I install my binaries on a mac OS 10.9 system, I get
> following error : "Incompatible library version: xml.dylib requires version
> 11.0.0 or
17 matches
Mail list logo
