Apologies for the self-serving inquiry, but I thought I'd come over and
address an issue I found over in Ruby-land (Nokogiri) while working with
some HTML fragments in a Rails application.
I noticed that the suite of "element children" functions
(xmlChildElementCount, xmlFirstElementChild and xmlL
was just an oversight.
Comments? Concerns?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Kyle VanderBeek wrote:
> Apologies for the self-serving inquiry, but I thought I'd come over and
> address an issue I found over in Ruby-land (Nokogiri) while working with
> some HTML fragments in a Rai
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > Is there any theoretical or design reason not to apply this patch to
> > tree.c? As I mentioned, working with HTML fragments to build we pages is
> a
> > pretty common task. Being able to traverse entity children on such a
> > fragment wo