Hi,
Susanne Oberhauser-Hirschoff writes:
> Daniel, in 2003 you wrote this:
> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/docbook/2003-03/msg00101.html
>
>> I tried to minimize the addition of xml:base when it could be avoided
>> in practice (i.e. if the absence of the xml:base would not generate
>> erroneous
I am working on a project that uses libxml2 extensively that also uses a
newer Intel chipset. I'm looking to improve it's performance and have read
that the newer Intel chipsets have new instructions (SSE4.2) that can help
accelerate XML parsing:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/xml-pars
Based purely on my own experience, these provide mixed benefit to a
fully validating parser. It depends on your input and how willing you
are to specialize.
For XML 1.0, valid code points are explicit and there are a ton of
them. It's not something easily fit into this SSE model. You're still
goin
