Re: [xml] Availability of libxml2-2.9.4 release candidate 2 - regexp

2016-05-09 Thread Pete Cordell
On 09/05/2016 13:55, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 11:35:28AM +0100, Pete Cordell wrote: On 09/05/2016 10:26, Daniel Veillard wrote: Is this OK? I used git format-patch. I'm new to submitting diffs! If you want another format let me know. Yup, just add it as an attachment i

Re: [xml] Availability of libxml2-2.9.4 release candidate 2 - regexp

2016-05-09 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 11:35:28AM +0100, Pete Cordell wrote: > On 09/05/2016 10:26, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > Hi Pete, > > > > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:02:28AM +0100, Pete Cordell wrote: > > > Thanks Daniel. I've managed to verify that the ab?c{0,1} pattern now > > > works. > > > But the f

Re: [xml] Availability of libxml2-2.9.4 release candidate 2 - regexp

2016-05-09 Thread Pete Cordell
On 09/05/2016 10:26, Daniel Veillard wrote: Hi Pete, On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:02:28AM +0100, Pete Cordell wrote: Thanks Daniel. I've managed to verify that the ab?c{0,1} pattern now works. But the following pattern still appears to fail: =>((2{1,2}|24)\.){2}2 #fails 24.24.2 Right, I g

Re: [xml] Availability of libxml2-2.9.4 release candidate 2 - regexp

2016-05-09 Thread Daniel Veillard
Hi Pete, On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:02:28AM +0100, Pete Cordell wrote: > Thanks Daniel. I've managed to verify that the ab?c{0,1} pattern now works. > But the following pattern still appears to fail: > > =>((2{1,2}|24)\.){2}2 > #fails > 24.24.2 Right, I gave it 30mn, looked at the graph bui

Re: [xml] Availability of libxml2-2.9.4 release candidate 2 - regexp

2016-05-09 Thread Pete Cordell
Thanks Daniel. I've managed to verify that the ab?c{0,1} pattern now works. But the following pattern still appears to fail: =>((2{1,2}|24)\.){2}2 #fails 24.24.2 Also, I see you haven't had a chance to put the test vectors in the test/regexp dir. If you let me know what form you'd like them