\setmathfont{Asana-Math.otf}
in my XeLaTeX source file.
No more off-by-one shift in character mapping. Everything looks as it should.
Many thanks to Will Robertson for his 'unicode-math' package and to
Apostolos Syropoulos for Asana Math.
Mariusz Wodzicki
-
is.
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
Khaled seems to have pinpointed the common source of all of these troubles
with garbled PDF files. I hope that now somebody contacts Jonathan Kew
about it.
Mariusz Wodzicki
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
> χαλεπὰ τὰ καλά
(...)
> Beauty is difficult
*Beautiful things* are difficult.
Sorry, I could not resist...
Mariusz Wodzicki
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
t to his fontspec package that
would make the declaration:
\setmainfont[...]{XITS Math}
load XITS Math for upright Roman and STIXGeneral for everything else.
This way the objective of XITS Math could be reached: to improve Math and
supply Old Style figures in STIXGeneral family.
Mariusz Wodzicki
of the Unicode is not really
suitable for text? Is it really so? My naive perhaps perception was that
STIXGeneral was not just a 'Math' font but a complete font that was
expected to be used for both text and Math.
Why then bother about designing 'OldStyle' figures
upright Roman, and STIXGeneral for everything else.
That would make Old Style figures available in text (of course, upright
Roman only), and would save unnecessary duplication of fonts in the
resulting PDF file.
Mariusz Wodzicki
--
Subscriptions,
ing
>> else.
>
> You can already do that, check the manual for selecting arbitrary italic
> and bold fonts.
>
> --
> Khaled Hosny
I know *that*. But it's cumbersome. It defeats one of the advantages of
using 'fontspec'; one would like to use just one versat
> On 06/05/2010 04:18 AM, Will Robertson wrote:
>> If you ask me, I can add this as an option somewhere in the package.
>> (I've seen old-style figures in maths in examples before, but never "in
>> the wild".)
>
> I have, in A. N. Whitehead’s “An Introduction to Mathematics”; search
> for the text
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:02:15PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu
> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 02:52:13PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I'm actually planning to include the rest of STIX styles in some
>> later
>> >> > release, STIX surpasses Termes in its
> You can now grap the four styles from git tree:
> http://github.com/khaledhosny/xits-math
>
> No proper release yet, but if no serious bugs appeared in the next 24
> hours, I'll make one.
>
> For text use "XITS", and "XITS Math" for math.
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
Thank you very much, Khaled! That
> - fontspec, unicode-math, luaotfload from CTAN (today)
> - luatex and xetex binaries from context-minimals
>
> luatex --version
> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.60.1-2010042811
>
> xetex --version
> XeTeX 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2 (Web2C 7.5.6)
>
> I have found the following problems:
>
> 1. Delimi
installed
under Windows Vista on another partition) which renders everything
correctly.
Both Fedora's TeXlIve 2010 and MiKTeX 2.8 have the most recent
unicode-math/fontspec installed.
Mariusz Wodzicki
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
> Original Nachricht
> Von: wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu
> An: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
>
> Datum: 17.06.2010 15:44
> Betreff: Re: [XeTeX] More info on segfaults in unicode-math on linux 64
> bit
>
>> I did myself some testing today with TeXLive 2010 i
David Perry wrote:
-
> SIL ViewGlyph should do the job.
Unfortunately, SIL ViewGlyph seems to be an obsolete piece of software. It
doesn't see any fonts with the .otf extension.
Mariusz
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List informa
> My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere.
> Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause
> this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough
> to solve this issue.
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
"an old version" should not
> Now I come to think of it, at that 1993 meeting at RHBNC, I seem to recall
> that one of the participants was glowing with pride because he had with
> him
> a portable computer that was running unix.
>
> I say "portable", but his legs were buckled at the knee as he staggered
> around, and the str
is conveniet not just
for XeLaTeX. It may be even more convenient for typing Math, e.g., in emails.
If there is interest I would be happy to make this layout together with detailed
instructions how to install it and use -- available to everybody.
Mariusz Wodzicki
17 matches
Mail list logo
