Re: [XeTeX] unicode-math testing

2010-05-27 Thread Michael Lynch
On 27/05/2010 05:55, Will Robertson wrote: Dear all, I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package, but an issue has arisen that I don't know how to debug. It is only reproducible under Windows while using the Asana Math font; a different font or a different platform gives acce

Re: [XeTeX] unicode-math testing

2010-05-27 Thread Michael Lynch
On 27/05/2010 17:20, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:37:01PM +0100, Michael Lynch wrote: On 27/05/2010 05:55, Will Robertson wrote: Dear all, I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package, but an issue has arisen that I don't know h

[XeTeX] (Off-topic) STIX Fonts

2010-05-30 Thread Michael Lynch
Hello, People may be interested to note that STIX Fonts v1.0 have been released (http://www.stixfonts.org/). I'd assumed the intention was to make use of the OpenType math feature, like Cambria Math, Asana Math and Neo Euler do, and this blog post from 2½ years ago (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/

Re: [XeTeX] (Off-topic) STIX Fonts

2010-05-30 Thread Michael Lynch
On 30/05/2010 15:37, Will Robertson wrote: On 2010-05-30 23:20:07 +0930, Michael Lynch said: Does anyone know any more about the project? Has the math feature definitely been delayed until a future version? Yep, the intial release has always been about glyph coverage and kerning. As they

[XeTeX] Problem with unicode-math and acronym packages

2010-06-15 Thread Michael Lynch
Hello all, I've come across a conflict between the unicode-math and acronym packages. If I run xelatex on the test file I've attached, I get the expected results (i.e. the acronyms work correctly). This is seen in AcronymTest.pdf. However, if I uncomment the lines relating to unicode-math (i.

Re: [XeTeX] Problem with unicode-math and acronym packages

2010-06-22 Thread Michael Lynch
On 16/06/2010 00:49, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:38:51AM +0300, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:23:33AM +0100, Michael Lynch wrote: Hello all, I've come across a conflict between the unicode-math and acronym packages. If I run xelatex on the

Re: [XeTeX] Combined sub- and superscript - solved

2010-08-07 Thread Michael Lynch
On 07/08/2010 23:32, Ross Moore wrote: Hi Peter, Sebastien, On 08/08/2010, at 7:33 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote: Am 07.08.2010 um 22:44 schrieb Sebastian Gerecke: BUT: This just has to be an utter hack and I can not believe it is the way it is supposed to be done. This hack is necessary becau

Re: [XeTeX] Checking for existence of font feature

2010-08-11 Thread Michael Lynch
On 11/08/2010 20:54, Michael Lynch wrote: Hello all, I'm trying to test for the existence of an OpenType font feature before it's used in a document. I want a command that will transparently emulate an acceptable alternative in the event that the feature doesn't exist, whi

[XeTeX] Checking for existence of font feature

2010-08-11 Thread Michael Lynch
Hello all, I'm trying to test for the existence of an OpenType font feature before it's used in a document. I want a command that will transparently emulate an acceptable alternative in the event that the feature doesn't exist, whilst logging the problem in the log file. Since the command is

Re: [XeTeX] Checking for existence of font feature

2010-08-11 Thread Michael Lynch
On 11/08/2010 22:54, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:39:07PM +0100, Michael Lynch wrote: On 11/08/2010 20:54, Michael Lynch wrote: Hello all, I'm trying to test for the existence of an OpenType font feature before it's used in a document. I want a command

Re: [XeTeX] Checking for existence of font feature

2010-08-19 Thread Michael Lynch
On 18/08/2010 06:10, Will Robertson wrote: On 2010-08-12 16:16:54 +0930, Khaled Hosny said: Ah, thank you. Are these features (relatively) new? Rather embarrassing not to have spotted them, but anyway… All were introduced in version 2, I think. Yep, very new. I've got a problem using the