I meant in header/footer, not headings. Sorry.
From: Meho R.
To: XeTeX ; tex-l...@tug.org
Sent: Mon, March 8, 2010 2:29:37 PM
Subject: [XeTeX] SmallCaps and Memoir pagestyle issue
Hi,
I've updated TeXLive 2009 today and noticed that my small caps in hea
: Fr. Michael Gilmary
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
Sent: Mon, March 8, 2010 3:01:59 PM
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] SmallCaps and Memoir pagestyle issue
Meho R. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated TeXLive 2009 today and noticed that my small caps in headings
> are gon
And I was wondering why even \let\memUChead\MakeLowercase refused to work just
to notice it's Polyglossia who "switches it off" :) Thanks for this info,
nolocalmarks did the trick.
From: Fr. Michael Gilmary
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platfor
Hi,
This is question for Vafa: can you explain what is the reason that in .pdf
file, created using xelatex+polyglossia with use of arabic as secondary
language (the main is latin), bidi is credited as "creator"? I do understand
that bidi is used for arabic, but, with due respect, I think it's v
As noted, because bidi isn't the creator of the PDF file and still claims it
is. "Created by Xe(La)TeX with bidi package" (something like "Created by LaTeX
with hyperref package") would be a little bit more acceptable, don't you think?
From: Vafa Khalighi
To:
ect: Re: [XeTeX] PDF Creator: "bidi"?
On 11 Mar 2010, at 17:48, Meho R. wrote:
> As noted, because bidi isn't the creator of the PDF file and still claims it
> is. "Created by Xe(La)TeX with bidi package" (something like "Created by
> LaTeX with hyperref package&
That page is very confusing to me, haven't managed to find a way to register.
Would it be OK to remind you here, in July?
From: Vafa Khalighi
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
Sent: Thu, March 11, 2010 11:46:39 PM
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] PDF
Nope, won't work. Although I registered successfully on berlios, logged in,
when I go to Mantis Bugs, I can't log in there, it says that my account is
disabled or blocked or username/password is incorrect (I'm sure u/p are
correct). ATM, I can't see any way to submit this bug. Well, I'll probabl
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Meho R. wrote:
>
>Nope, won't work. Although I registered successfully on berlios, logged in,
>when I go to Mantis Bugs, I can't log in there, it says that my account is
>disabled or blocked or username/password is incorrect (I'm
Thanks for the font. Although there are some issues like overlapping of
harakaats and letters, I like it very much. Also, I hope you don't mind if I
mention another great font for this purpose: KFGQPC Uthman Taha Naskh
(http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/).
Still, for typesetting quranic text wit
So, what we have concluded: that we have accsupp and Junicode. But can anyone
show how to solve this problem using the example in OP's post?
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text,Numbers=OldStyle,Ligatures={Required,Common,Rare}]{Junicode}
\begin{document}
Fi
Hi,
This issue is bothering me for some time now: when kasra and tashdid are used
together, kasra gets positioned just below tashdid instead of below the actual
letter. This is a well-known issue and some workarounds have been made (e.g.,
reversing the order of writing, first kasra, then tashdi
Sorry for making it sound like a bug, I didn't mean to put it that way. Having
kasra below shadda/tashdid is fine by me in most cases. But there are some
times
when I have to put kasra below the letter (e.g., when typesetting parts of
arabic text containing quranic verses). I'm aware it is up t
OK, there's maybe another way (maybe not related directly to XeLaTeX, so I
apologize for off topic): is there a way to disable certain glyphs in a font
using (Xe)LaTeX? In the font I'm using: KFGQPC Uthman Taha Naskh
font: http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/ there are glyphs buried deep in the
fi
Hi,
I updated my TL installation to TL2010 and noticed that damma is overlapping
hamza using Uthman Taha font (the font is free and can be obtained
here: http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/). This doesn't happen with TL2009.
Since I still have a local installation of TL2009, I tried to replace al
> From: Fr. Michael Gilmary
> To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 16:11:53
> Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs
>
> Well, I've got this much working ---
>
> if I add in the preamble:
>
> \setmainfont[Numbers={OldStyle,Proportional}]{Latin
And another shot:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont[Numbers={OldStyle,Proportional}]{Adobe Garamond Pro}
\newfontfamily\fnmarkfont{Myriad Pro}
\makeatletter
\renewcommand...@makefnmark}{%
\mbox{\textsuperscript{\fnmarkfo...@thefnmark}}}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
> From: Fr. Michael Gilmary
> To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 21:09:44
> Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs
>
> Meho R. wrote:
>
> > And another shot:
>>
> >
>> \documentclass{article}
&
> From: Fr. Michael Gilmary
> To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 22:19:51
> Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs
>
> Meho R. wrote:
>
>
> You're right about memoir, I got the same result as you did.
On 23.02.2011 12:43, David Perry wrote:
> John,
>
> I don't know if FontForge uses the same syntax as Adobe's FDK (also
> used in FontLab), but I think it might. Here's how I do in
> FontLab. (In FL if you don't specify a script and language it applies
> Latin script and the default language, whi
On 23.02.2011 14:17, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Meho R. wrote:
>
>> 4. The old problem about PDF search unfortunately still remains: only
>> basic standard ligatures are recognized. I would be happy if someone
>> knows a way to correct this
21 matches
Mail list logo
