[XeTeX] ligatures in (plain) XeTeX

2010-11-20 Thread Jean-Claude Raoult
them without butchering into XeTeX tables ? Jean-Claude Raoult -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

[XeTeX] ligatures in (plain) XeTeX

2010-12-14 Thread Jean-Claude Raoult
yping them directly… I suspect that the ff, ffi, ffl, st and ct ligatures do not exist in this Garamond. Greetings, Jean-Claude Raoult -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

[XeTeX] Ligatures

2013-06-02 Thread Jean-Claude Raoult
ical. Nothing worked. Please, think of people using plain TeX. I am certainly not the only one. Sincerely, Jean-Claude Raoult -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Re: [XeTeX] Ligatures

2013-06-02 Thread Jean-Claude Raoult
very much: your solution does work: the st and ct ligatures are found! I shall do as you suggest and take a look at the Properties of this font. Thank you again, Jean-Claude Raoult -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information,

Re: [XeTeX] Ligatures

2013-06-19 Thread Jean-Claude Raoult
Le 19/06/2013 12:23, Khaled Hosny a écrit : On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:53:00AM +0200, Jean-Claude Raoult wrote: The documentation is clear, for people using LaTeX or rather XeLaTeX. Presumably because you were reading LaTeX oriented documentation? XeTeX documentation itself documents the low