[XeTeX] Bug in \textipa from xunicode.sty

Hi, The \textipa{} command, from the xunicode package, maps the uppercase U letter to \textupsilon (actually, a turned uppercase omega letter: Ʊ). I think this is wrong. It should be mapped to \textscupsilon (the small-caps version of the same symbol: ʊ). See this chart: http://www.ling.ohio-state

Re: [XeTeX] Bug in \textipa from xunicode.sty

Hi, 16/06/10 @ 15:45 (+1000), thus spake Ross Moore: > Hi Andy and Ernest, > > On 16/06/2010, at 2:34 PM, Andy Lin wrote: > > > Regarding \textipa{U}, you're absolutely right. I'd noticed this in > > Nov 2009, along with some other glyphs that were different from tipa. > > Ross actually correcte

[XeTeX] problems with some fonts

Hi, I am experiencing some problems with certain fonts. First, with a font called Beteckna. Bold face and italics don't work (are replaced with medium weight and upright shape). There are no error messages. According to fontconfig bold and italics should be available: $ fc-list |grep -i beteckna B

[XeTeX] Fake old-style figures & small-caps with XeTeX?

Hi! Is it possible to generate fake old-style figures & small capitals for fonts missing these glyphs with XeTeX. I used to use the mathpoz package that does exactly that, but something tells me it's not compatible with XeTeX. Cheers. Ernest -- Su

Re: [XeTeX] problems with some fonts

Hi, 23/07/10 @ 10:27 (+0200), thus spake Peter Dyballa: > > Am 23.07.2010 um 02:30 schrieb Ernest Adrogué: > > >I am experiencing some problems with certain fonts. > >First, with a font called Beteckna. Bold face and > >italics don't work (are replaced with me

Re: [XeTeX] Fake old-style figures & small-caps with XeTeX?

23/07/10 @ 17:12 (+0200), thus spake enrico.grego...@univr.it: > > Hi! > > > > Is it possible to generate fake old-style figures & small > > capitals for fonts missing these glyphs with XeTeX. > > I used to use the mathpoz package that does exactly that, > > but something tells me it's not compati

Re: [XeTeX] problems with some fonts

23/07/10 @ 17:45 (+0200), thus spake Peter Dyballa: > > Am 23.07.2010 um 11:21 schrieb Ernest Adrogué: > > >This is what I get: > > > >$ fc-list : file family fullname | grep -i beteckna > >/usr/share/fonts/truetype/beteckna/ > >BetecknaLowerCaseItalicConde

Re: [XeTeX] Fake old-style figures & small-caps with XeTeX?

27/07/10 @ 20:47 (+0100), thus spake cfr...@imapmail.org: > On Tue 27th Jul, 2010 at 09:48, Khaled Hosny seems to have written: > > >On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 02:36:45AM +0200, Ernest Adrogué wrote: > >>23/07/10 @ 17:12 (+0200), thus spake enrico.grego...@univr.it: > &g

[XeTeX] changing font for numbers in math mode?

Hi there, I was doing some tests with various math font packages such as fourier, mathdesign, txfonts, etc., and I realised that these packages could also be used with other text fonts other than the fonts they were intended to be used with. For example, mathdesign uses math symbols (italics and

Re: [XeTeX] changing font for numbers in math mode?

26/06/11 @ 18:10 (+0200), Tobias Schoel escriu: > that is done by the range key in the \setmathfont-command from the > unicode-math package. (At least, if I have understood the > documentation of unicode-math correctly.) I think unicode-math only works with Unicode math fonts. Here, I was using no

Re: [XeTeX] changing font for numbers in math mode?

Hi, 27/06/11 @ 08:32 (+0100), David Cottenden escriu: > Greetings, > > I'm not very expert - so don't quiz me overly - but my understanding > is that setmathrm changes the maths roman font, whereas by default > the maths digits are drawn from the normal maths font. You can > change which font the

Re: [XeTeX] changing font for numbers in math mode?

30/06/11 @ 11:39 (+0200), Ulrike Fischer escriu: > Assuming that you want to change only the numbers: > > \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article} > \usepackage[charter]{mathdesign} > \usepackage{fontspec} > \setmainfont[Scale=0.95]{Charis SIL} > > > \normalfont > \makeatletter > > \DeclareSymbolF