eporting this bug
to xetex mailinglist before anything. Anyway, I hope that TeX Live 2010
will be released without this issue.
Sincerely,
--
Dohyun Kim
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
.
\XeTeXinterchartokenstate = 1
A.\the\spacefactor % 3000; should be 1000?
\bye
=
I expected the same spacefactor between the first line and the second.
Actually it is not, however. Is this a bug of XeTeX?
--
Dohyun Kim
College of Law, Dongguk University
Seoul, Republic of Korea
>
> 10.8.2 here.
>
>
> --
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
--
Dohyun Kim
College of Law, Dongguk University
Seoul, Republic of Korea
oldplain.tex
Description: TeX document
oldpl
2013/3/15 Dohyun Kim :
> Hi,
>
> This new version seems to do unicode normalization (NFC) by default. It was
> not the case of previous version of xetex, as far as
> \XeTeXinputnormalization=1 is not declared explicitly.
>
> The new feature (or bug) affects pre-modern Hang
al feature
should decrease the glyph advance, current XeTeX increases it instead.
Harfbuzz, on the other hand, works correctly. I could not figure out
where this problem comes from.
Regards,
--
Dohyun Kim
vertical_layout.patch
Description: B
Mar 28, 2013 at 10:29:35AM +0900, Dohyun Kim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> "vertical" option of XeTeX 0. is currently broken. Applying
>> attached patch seems to make it work better, though I know almost
>> nothing about C language.
>
> I appreaciate if yo
g the technicians need to learn from the artists. If it isn't
> aesthetically pleasing, it's probably wrong.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailm
positions[2*i+1] =
engine->font->unitsToPoints(y + hbPositions[i].x_offset);
+ positions[2*i+1] =
engine->font->unitsToPoints(y - hbPositions[i].x_offset);
x += hbPositions[i].y_advance;
y += hbPositions[i].x_a
put file removed.
)
Error 256 (driver return code) generating output;
So it seems that we have to do something with xdvipdfmx and/or its
freetype library. The SourceHanSans fonts are sure to have no problem
as they work quite well on my mac OS.
Best,
Dohyun Kim
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
