[XeTeX] Incorrect rendering of Vedic Sanskrit accents

2015-05-22 Thread David M. Jones
I posted this to the XeTeX sourceforge tracker a couple of weeks ago, and it was suggested that I also mention it here. The sourceforge ticket is https://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/bugs/111/ and the zip file is https://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/bugs/111/attachment/xetex-indic-bug.zip Cheers

Re: [XeTeX] Incorrect rendering of Vedic Sanskrit accents

2015-05-22 Thread David M. Jones
Mike Maxwell's original post hasn't shown up here yet, so I'm lumping two responses together. > Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 12:24:49 -0600 > From: Bobby de Vos > Reply-To: "XeTeX (Unicode-based TeX) discussion." > > On 2015-05-22 10:49, maxwell wrote: >

Re: [XeTeX] Incorrect rendering of Vedic Sanskrit accents

2015-05-22 Thread David M. Jones
with other Devanagari fonts and > see what happends? > Zdeněk Wagner > http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/ > http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz > > > 2015-05-22 16:14 GMT+02:00 David M. Jones : > > I posted this to the XeTeX sourceforge tracker a couple of weeks ago, >

Re: [XeTeX] Incorrect rendering of Vedic Sanskrit accents

2015-05-22 Thread David M. Jones
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 22:52:24 +0200 > From: Zdenek Wagner > The requirement of the Indic specification is to display the dotted > circle if the mark cannot be combined. Aha! Thank you the pointer. I assume you're referring to this? http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otfntdev/indicot/

Re: [XeTeX] Incorrect rendering of Vedic Sanskrit accents

2015-05-24 Thread David M. Jones
\\ > > > tam̱̐ & ta + candrabindu + anudatta & \V{\1तँ॒} \\[\medskipamount] > > > ta̍ḥ & ta + udatta + visarga & \R{\1त॑ः}\\ > > > taḥ̍ & ta + visarga + udatta & \B{\1तः॑} \\ > > > ta̱ḥ & ta + anudatta + visarga & \R{\1त॒ः}\\ >

Re: [XeTeX] fonts and diacritics

2015-06-13 Thread David M. Jones
In addition to the other fonts that have been mentioned here, version 2 of the STIX fonts, due out later this year, should provide a very attractive option: http://www.stixfonts.org/ They also have a less restrictive license than even the Brill fonts. David. P.S. Full disclosure: The AMS is

[XeTeX] TECkit maps for ISO 15919 to Brahmic scripts

2015-06-25 Thread David M. Jones
This is a sequel of sorts to a message I sent to the list a couple of weeks ago where I mentioned that I've been experimenting with typesetting Devanagari using XeTeX. One part of the experiment was to develop a TECkit mapping to convert Unicode-encoded IAST text into Devanagari. Then I stumbled

Re: [XeTeX] TECkit maps for ISO 15919 to Brahmic scripts

2015-06-25 Thread David M. Jones
Hi, Zdeněk, Good question. I'm definitely not an expert, but my understanding is that historically it went the other way. That is, for most of its history as a written language, Sanskrit was routinely written in whatever script was used for the local vernacular, but that in recent centuries it's