Re: Google Disk

2019-03-16 Thread Janusz S. Bień
On Sat, Mar 16 2019 at 6:59 +00, Ross Moore wrote: > Hi Janusz, > > On 16/03/2019, at 17:51, "Janusz S. Bień" wrote: > > Sorry for the previous male sent by mistake (the shortcuts in Gnus are > sometimes confusing...) > > On Fri, Mar 15 2019 at 13:34 +01, BPJ wrote: > > Den 2019-03-15 kl. 08:

Re: Google Disk (was: XeLaTeX to Word/OpenOffice - the state of the art?)

2019-03-16 Thread Karljürgen Feuerherm
Ross, Your reply caught my eye, and I am now looking at the pdfx package documentation. May I ask, if accessibility is a concern, why a-2b/-2u rather than -ua-1, which seems directly targeted at this? Many thanks, K > You should use the pdfx package and prepare for PDF/A-2b or -2u. > This

Re: pandoc problem (was: XeLaTeX to Word/OpenOffice - the state of the art?)

2019-03-16 Thread Karljurgen Feuerherm
FWIW, I am surprised (though I don’t know why the difference). The test file I ran, on which I based my earlier comment, included the packages below. As you can see, several of these are on your list. It did burp on the inclusion of one particular graphics file, which I did not pursue…. If some

Re: Google Disk (was: XeLaTeX to Word/OpenOffice - the state of the art?)

2019-03-16 Thread Ross Moore
Hi Karljūrgen, On 17/03/2019, at 1:42, "Karljürgen Feuerherm" wrote: > Ross, > > Your reply caught my eye, and I am now looking at the pdfx package > documentation. > > May I ask, if accessibility is a concern, why a-2b/-2u rather than -ua-1, > which seems directly targeted at this? PDF/UA