Re: [XeTeX] which TeX-based software

2018-05-01 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 1 May 2018 at 08:57, Philip Taylor (RHUoL) wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> >> It is of course completely free and opensources, no licences (that is >> also true for nearly all TeX anyway). >> > No licence ? It will never get into TeX Live then :-) What I meant was no licencing fees of cou

Re: [XeTeX] which TeX-based software

2018-05-01 Thread Wilfred van Rooijen
Following Mojca's explanation, I feel I should switch to ConTeXt :-)) Wilfred On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 3:43 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On 26 April 2018 at 14:20, Carrs wrote: > Hi, > > a newbie question. I would like advice on which TeX-based software it would > be best to learn in detai

Re: [XeTeX] which TeX-based software

2018-05-01 Thread r . ermers
One other advantage is that Context works with xml quite smoothly, once you know how to set it up. Robert > Op 1 mei 2018, om 13:38 heeft Wilfred van Rooijen het > volgende geschreven: > > Following Mojca's explanation, I feel I should switch to ConTeXt :-)) > > Wilfred > > > > On Tuesday

Re: [XeTeX] which TeX-based software

2018-05-01 Thread Philip Taylor
r.erm...@hccnet.nl wrote: One other advantage is that Context works with xml quite smoothly, once you know how to set it up. So can plain XeTeX -- please see http://hellenic-institute.uk/research/lpl/Greek-MSS/Catalogue/Eutypon/e31-a02.pdf (first

Re: [XeTeX] which TeX-based software

2018-05-01 Thread Zdenek Wagner
2018-05-01 17:22 GMT+02:00 Philip Taylor : > r.erm...@hccnet.nl wrote: > > One other advantage is that Context works with xml quite smoothly, once > you know how to set it up. > > So can plain XeTeX -- please see http://hellenic-institute.uk/ > research/lpl/Greek-MSS/Catalogue/Eutypon/e31-a02.pdf