On 1 May 2018 at 08:57, Philip Taylor (RHUoL) wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>>
>> It is of course completely free and opensources, no licences (that is
>> also true for nearly all TeX anyway).
>>
> No licence ? It will never get into TeX Live then :-)
What I meant was no licencing fees of cou
Following Mojca's explanation, I feel I should switch to ConTeXt :-))
Wilfred
On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 3:43 PM, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
On 26 April 2018 at 14:20, Carrs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a newbie question. I would like advice on which TeX-based software it would
> be best to learn in detai
One other advantage is that Context works with xml quite smoothly, once you
know how to set it up.
Robert
> Op 1 mei 2018, om 13:38 heeft Wilfred van Rooijen het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Following Mojca's explanation, I feel I should switch to ConTeXt :-))
>
> Wilfred
>
>
>
> On Tuesday
r.erm...@hccnet.nl wrote:
One other advantage is that Context works with xml quite smoothly,
once you know how to set it up.
So can plain XeTeX -- please see
http://hellenic-institute.uk/research/lpl/Greek-MSS/Catalogue/Eutypon/e31-a02.pdf
(first
2018-05-01 17:22 GMT+02:00 Philip Taylor :
> r.erm...@hccnet.nl wrote:
>
> One other advantage is that Context works with xml quite smoothly, once
> you know how to set it up.
>
> So can plain XeTeX -- please see http://hellenic-institute.uk/
> research/lpl/Greek-MSS/Catalogue/Eutypon/e31-a02.pdf