Re: [XeTeX] [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Issues with Sanskrit 2003 font

2017-06-18 Thread Zdenek Wagner
Hi all, as far as I know the Devanagari fonts are either Sanskrit with all conjuncts that cannot be switched off or Hindi without the Sanskrit conjuncts. The only exception is FreeSerif which takes the Devanagari block from the Velthuis Devanagari and models the two modes from the "good old" Velth

Re: [XeTeX] [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Issues with Sanskrit 2003 font

2017-06-18 Thread Mike Maxwell
On 6/18/2017 4:04 AM, Zdenek Wagner wrote: as far as I know the Devanagari fonts are either Sanskrit with all conjuncts that cannot be switched off or Hindi without the Sanskrit conjuncts. Do other languages that use Devanagari, like Gujarati, use the same conjuncts as Hindi? -- Mike Max

Re: [XeTeX] [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Issues with Sanskrit 2003 font

2017-06-18 Thread Dominik Wujastyk
Dear Zdenek, what you say is borne out by my tests, where the only font showing a difference between Sanskrit and Hindi is the FreeSerif (the -kti- conjunct). (I used the Fontspec/Polyglossia system for language-switching.) Best, Dominik On 18 June 2017 at 02:04, Zdenek Wagner wrote: > Hi all,

Re: [XeTeX] [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Issues with Sanskrit 2003 font

2017-06-18 Thread Zdenek Wagner
2017-06-18 17:01 GMT+02:00 Dominik Wujastyk : > Dear Zdenek, what you say is borne out by my tests, where the only font > showing a difference between Sanskrit and Hindi is the FreeSerif (the -kti- > conjunct). > Not only kta but also nna and many other (try for instance प्रसन्नता)॰ > > (I used

Re: [XeTeX] [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Issues with Sanskrit 2003 font

2017-06-18 Thread Zdenek Wagner
2017-06-18 16:38 GMT+02:00 Mike Maxwell : > On 6/18/2017 4:04 AM, Zdenek Wagner wrote: > >> as far as I know the Devanagari fonts are either Sanskrit with all >> conjuncts that cannot be switched off or Hindi without the Sanskrit >> conjuncts. >> > > Do other languages that use Devanagari, like Gu

Re: [XeTeX] [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Issues with Sanskrit 2003 font

2017-06-18 Thread Philip Taylor
Zdenek Wagner wrote: > If your browser is new enough, you should see the difference on my web page > http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/freefont-devanagari/ where the same word is in > the element, first with xml:lang="sa", then with xml:lang="hi". Difference visible in Seamonkey 2.46 64-bit (Windows

Re: [XeTeX] [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Issues with Sanskrit 2003 font

2017-06-18 Thread Christian Boitet
Hi, 18/6/17 Marathi (script) is surely not a subset ofHindi (script) as, for example, there are 2 letters "L" in Marathi and 1 only in Hindi. Maybe some colleagues from India or Pakistan could help. I put 3 in copy. IITB/CFILT is doing work on Hindi, Marathi, Bengali and mor

Re: [XeTeX] [INDOLOGY] {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} Re: Issues with Sanskrit 2003 font

2017-06-18 Thread Zdenek Wagner
2017-06-19 1:16 GMT+02:00 Christian Boitet : > Hi, 18/6/17 > > Marathi (script) is surely not a subset ofHindi (script) as, for example, > there are 2 letters "L" in Marathi and 1 only in Hindi. > You are right. I forgot Salman Khan who has this second L in his name. > > Maybe some colleagues fr