Re: [XeTeX] Polyglossia error(s) for Marathi language

2017-04-21 Thread Maïeul Rouquette
could you explain me the aim of this change? I don't know anything in Denavagari, and I would like to add a good message in my pull request (but maybe, it would be better you do the pull request) Le 20 avr. 2017 à 21:51, Dominik Wujastyk a écrit : > If there are going to be some edits to polygl

Re: [XeTeX] Polyglossia error(s) for Marathi language

2017-04-21 Thread Zdenek Wagner
This is not related to Devanagari as a script but to a language. Sanskrit was originally written in the Devanagari (or maybe even in Brahmi, I am not such an expert) but since Hindu and Buddhists texts and prayers use Snaskrit up to now and people form other parts of the Indian subcontinent need no

Re: [XeTeX] [tex-live] tl17 pretest init

2017-04-21 Thread Philip Taylor
Siep Kroonenberg wrote: > I already wrote in a previous mail that I could not reproduce it > either (on Windows). I don't think I was explicit in my previous message as to the exact scenario that provokes the error here, Siep : > The dialogue box in question is the "Enter path for TEXDIR" box

[XeTeX] new version of HarfBuzz

2017-04-21 Thread maxwell
I believe (correct me if I'm wrong!) that xetex uses the HarfBuzz engine. There was a bug in this engine that prevented a new Nastaliq font from SIL from working properly. A fix for this bug has just been accepted (I believe it's this one: https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/pull/475). It's n

Re: [XeTeX] new version of HarfBuzz

2017-04-21 Thread Jonathan Kew
I believe that xetex should be unaffected by that bug, because that was an issue with the harfbuzz interface to graphite, but xetex uses graphite directly without going through the harfbuzz layer (provided you load the font with the /GR option, or whatever the fontspec equivalent of that is).

Re: [XeTeX] new version of HarfBuzz

2017-04-21 Thread maxwell
On 2017-04-21 13:46, Jonathan Kew wrote: I believe that xetex should be unaffected by that bug, because that was an issue with the harfbuzz interface to graphite, but xetex uses graphite directly without going through the harfbuzz layer (provided you load the font with the /GR option, or whatever

Re: [XeTeX] [tex-live] tl17 pretest init

2017-04-21 Thread Siep Kroonenberg
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Philip Taylor wrote: > > > Siep Kroonenberg wrote: > > I already wrote in a previous mail that I could not reproduce it > > either (on Windows). > I don't think I was explicit in my previous message as to the exact scenario > that provokes the error here

Re: [XeTeX] Polyglossia error(s) for Marathi language

2017-04-21 Thread Dominik Wujastyk
Thank you, Zdenek. It's exactly as you say. Sanskrit is a language that is recorded in several different writing systems. In Bengal, Sanskrit is written and printed in the Bengali alphabet. In Karnataka, it is written and printed in the Kannada alphabet. And so on. About fourteen writing syst