> On Jun 15, 2016, at 6:13 PM, David Carlisle wrote:
>
> On 16 June 2016 at 00:08, Herb Schulz wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Again, sorry for the top post.
>>
>> Does
>>
>> kpsewhich hyperref.cfg
>>
>> really return a file in the .../doc/... branch?
>>
>
> Oh of course! well spotted.
>
> So that
Thanks for your help.
I'm using XeTeX .6 from TeX Live 2016/W32TeX.
I'm using version 3.0 of the font.
This command fires the feature properly:
\test{Padauk/GR:1970040686=1}
And none of these work:
\test{Padauk:+ulon}
\test{Padauk/GR:+ulon}
\test{Padauk/GR:+ulon=1}
\test{Padauk/GR:+ul
On 16/6/16 21:58, Lorna Evans wrote:
Thanks for your help.
I'm using XeTeX .6 from TeX Live 2016/W32TeX.
I'm using version 3.0 of the font.
This command fires the feature properly:
\test{Padauk/GR:1970040686=1}
And none of these work:
\test{Padauk:+ulon}
\test{Padauk/GR:+ulon}
Curiou
Original Message
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] graphite-info.tex
From: Jonathan Kew
To: XeTeX (Unicode-based TeX) discussion.
Date: 6/16/2016 4:12 PM
On 16/6/16 21:58, Lorna Evans wrote:
Thanks for your help.
I'm using XeTeX .6 from TeX Live 2016/W32TeX.
I'm using version 3.0
ulon was the feature id in 2.8 but may not be in 3.0
Lorna if you have access to the gdl I can look to see what it should be.
Andrew
On Friday, 17 June 2016, Lorna Evans wrote:
> Thanks for your help.
>
> I'm using XeTeX .6 from TeX Live 2016/W32TeX.
>
> I'm using version 3.0 of the font.
>
On 6/16/2016 11:46 AM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
kpsewhich hyperref.cfg
really return a file in the .../doc/... branch?
Oh of course! well spotted.
So that is the error.
The file is correctly installed in the doc branch but the OP's
$TEXINPUTS is incorrectly including the
/groups/tools/texlive/2
Howdy,
I'd guess it was dumb luck? It just happened that the .../tex/ branch was
searched before the .../doc/ branch.
Good Luck,
Herb Schulz
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 5:10 PM, maxwell wrote:
>
> I remain mystified why this problem didn't bite us with older TeXLive
> distributions (or why it sud
2016-06-17 0:16 GMT+02:00 Herb Schulz :
> Howdy,
>
> I'd guess it was dumb luck? It just happened that the .../tex/ branch was
> searched before the .../doc/ branch.
>
I think that the order insuch a case depends on the inode value rather than
the path name, hence it is unpredictable.
>
> Good L