Zdeněk,
Thank you very much. Very useful, and you confirm my suspect
the data in the CLDR is not always reliable. Furthermore, it's
obvious it's intended mainly for displaying plain text in
some especific contexts and not for fine typesetting. At first
my idea was to sinchronize more or less regu
Apostolos,
> preface = \textPi \textrho\acctonos \textomicron\textlambda
\textomicron\textgamma
>
> XeLaTeX is Unicode aware and can handle Unicode strings. Therefore, I
fail to see
> why you are doing things this way. The LGR font encoding is an ancient
hack that
> has no usage anymore.
Of
On 23 March 2016 at 19:31, Javier Bezos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on a new version of babel, with a new way to define
> languages in a descriptive way, more than in a programmatic one (of
> course, the latter won't be excluded because it's still necessary).
>
> The idea is to create a set o
Mojca,
Thank you. See me reply to Zdeněk.
What is the difference between months.format.wide and
months.stand-alone.wide?
In most languages, none. This distinction is made by the CLDR,
but I wonder if it's useful here, so very likely the format
branch should be removed.
In Slovenian one some
Apostolos,
preface = \textPi \textrho\acctonos \textomicron\textlambda
\textomicron\textgamma
XeLaTeX is Unicode aware and can handle Unicode strings. Therefore, I fail to
see
why you are doing things this way. The LGR font encoding is an ancient hack that
has no usage anymore.
Of course, i
Hi Javier,
On Mar 24, 2016, at 5:59 PM, Javier Bezos
mailto:jbez...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Apostolos,
preface = \textPi \textrho\acctonos \textomicron\textlambda
\textomicron\textgamma
XeLaTeX is Unicode aware and can handle Unicode strings. Therefore, I fail to
see
why you are doing things this
