Dear XeTeX list,
I am dealing with a collection of texts in Sanskrit, for which the
builtin limitation of TeX to not perform hyphenation after the 63rd
character of a string is imposing a serious limitation, as such
strings do occur. One reason for this is that one can freely form very
long compou
On 15/3/16 14:24, Peter Mukunda Pasedach wrote:
Dear XeTeX list,
I am dealing with a collection of texts in Sanskrit, for which the
builtin limitation of TeX to not perform hyphenation after the 63rd
character of a string is imposing a serious limitation, as such
strings do occur. One reason for
Dear Jonathan,
yes, recompiling xetex is fine!
At 255 characters I still have 32 occurences left, at 500 two, and at
1000 zero. Thanks for looking into this!
Peter
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> On 15/3/16 14:24, Peter Mukunda Pasedach wrote:
>>
>> Dear XeTeX list,
>>
>
There could be some subtle problems that simply changing the character count
constant causes.
In particular, the allocation size of a "whatsit" language node might also need
changing, which would require adjusting other code in the core engine that
assumes a default small size for that language
On 15/3/16 18:04, Doug McKenna wrote:
There could be some subtle problems that simply changing the character count
constant causes.
In particular, the allocation size of a "whatsit" language node might also need changing,
which would require adjusting other code in the core engine that assumes
2016-03-16 0:06 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Kew :
> On 15/3/16 18:04, Doug McKenna wrote:
>
>> There could be some subtle problems that simply changing the character
>> count constant causes.
>>
>> In particular, the allocation size of a "whatsit" language node might
>> also need changing, which would requ