It's certainly possible to limit the number of default transitions, but
with the ever increasing expanse that is Unicode, while it might seem
unrealistic, really it's more a matter of time until someone actually
needs more classes than are currently available
There is an obvious optimization a
That sounds pretty encouraging!
- Pomax
On 12/13/2015 6:11 PM, Simon Cozens wrote:
Here's the relevant code:
p:=cur_chr; scan_usv_num;
p:=p+cur_val;
n:=sf_code(cur_val) mod @"1;
scan_optional_equals;
scan_char_class;
define(p,data,cur_val*@"1 +
[please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the XeTeX mailing list]
> > I'm updating the `ucharclasses.sty' to completely cover Unicode.
> > This style file maps Unicode character blocks to character classes,
> > and I've hit the 256 entry limit of \XeTeXcharclass...
> >
> > Any chance to extend it to 1
On 15/12/2015 04:02, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> I guess this would need a complete rewrite of the ucharclasses package
> (so Michiel should answer :-), but yes, such an approach could solve
> the issue.
> Regardless of that, I think that \XeTeXcharclass should allow more
> than 256 registers.
Yeah, i
