Sorry, there is nothing like bugzilla for TeX Live, everything is discussed
in a mailing list and there are already several threads on this topic
(other fonts are affected too). You can either subscribe to the list or
download archived messages. The information is here:
http://tug.org/mailman/list
I am forwarding this message because it may be interesting for people
here...
Zdeněk Wagner
http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/
http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jiang Jiang
Date: 2015-04-25 16:25 GMT+02:00
Subject: Re: [tex-live] XeTeX or xdvipdfmx Broken
One more message that may be interesting for XeTeX users.
Zdeněk Wagner
http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/
http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Koch
Date: 2015-04-25 16:55 GMT+02:00
Subject: [tex-live] XeTeX or xdvipdfmx Broken
To: Jiang Jiang
Cc: T
Due to lack of time, skills and motivation, I’ll be no longer able to
work on XeTeX, so I’m stepping down as a maintainer.
Regards,
Khaled
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 25/04/2015 18:31, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> Due to lack of time, skills and motivation, I’ll be no longer able to
> work on XeTeX, so I’m stepping down as a maintainer.
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
Hello Khaled,
Thanks for all of your work on XeTeX: it has been very much appreciated.
Joseph
---
>
> Due to lack of time, skills and motivation, I’ll be no longer able to
> work on XeTeX, so I’m stepping down as a maintainer.
>
These are not good news. I think this means the project has no maintainer,
right?
If this is true I could try to help but I am not sure whether I can do the work
Thanks Khaled for all your hard work. I am really grateful to you for the
effort you put in.
I am also interested in working on xetex as a maintainer.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
> I do realize the usual MWE requirement, and I did not provide one at first
> because really what I was trying to find out was not related to a specific
> example, but more the matter of whether Luabidi was likely to be upgraded
> so as to be as fully functional as XeTeX bidi, as Vafa had suggeste
On 2015-04-25, 15:29, "Arthur Reutenauer"
wrote:
>> I do realize the usual MWE requirement, and I did not provide one at
>>first
>> because really what I was trying to find out was not related to a
>>specific
>> example, but more the matter of whether Luabidi was likely to be
>>upgraded
>> so a
Thanks for all these thoughts.
Incidentally, for what it's worth, while it was working (all three weeks
or so), I found the Hebrew as well as the English output just fine :)
[contra my expectation, given the caveat in the Lua manual and the
polyglossia warning]
[and I see that somehow I sent a re
Dear Khaled,
Your efforts have been deeply appreciated. I can only imagine the time
this must have cost.
Best wishes in your other endeavours!
K
On 2015-04-25, 13:31, "Khaled Hosny" wrote:
>Due to lack of time, skills and motivation, I¹ll be no longer able to
>work on XeTeX, so I¹m stepping d
On 25 April 2015 at 18:31, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> Due to lack of time, skills and motivation, I’ll be no longer able to
> work on XeTeX, so I’m stepping down as a maintainer.
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
>
>
Khaled,
thanks for all your work on this.
I have a horrible feeling that my tex--xet bug repor
* Skriv a reas Khaled Hosny (khaledho...@eglug.org):
|> Due to lack of time, skills and motivation, I’ll be no longer able to
|> work on XeTeX, so I’m stepping down as a maintainer.
|>
|> Regards,
|> Khaled
I thank you for all the work, dedication, and grace you brought to XeTeX. I
13 matches
Mail list logo
