Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Akira Kakuto
Dear Denis, a bug with latest xetex: XeTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-0.1 (preloaded format=xelatex 2014.6.19) occurs, probably related to color \specials: in the following MWE (say `test.tex') compiled with xelatex, the text after the tcolorbox environment on page 2 is colored in white.

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:51:42 +0900 schrieb Akira Kakuto: > Therefore the bug may be in (x)dvipdfmx. Imho it is there. As I mentioned in the tex.sx question there is no problem if the xdv from texlive is processed with the (older) xdvipdfmx from miktex. -- Ulrike Fischer http://www.troublesho

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Dear Akira and Ulrike, Le mar. 24 juin 2014 à 12h01, Ulrike Fischer a écrit : > Am Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:51:42 +0900 schrieb Akira Kakuto: > >> Therefore the bug may be in (x)dvipdfmx. > > Imho it is there. As I mentioned in the tex.sx question there is no > problem if the xdv from texlive is proc

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Akira Kakuto
latex ---> dvi ---> dvipdfmx ---> pdf shows the same drawback: \documentclass[dvipdfmx]{article} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{tcolorbox} % \tcbuselibrary{breakable} % \begin{document} % \rule{0.4pt}{17cm} % \begin{tcolorbox}[breakable] \lipsum[1] \end{tcolorbox} \lipsum \end{document} Therefo

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Akira Kakuto
I have confirmed that, in the case of dvipdfmx, \documentclass[dvipdfm]{article} is ok, but \documentclass[dvipdfmx]{article} is ng. Therefore the bug may be in dvipdfmx.def and xetex.def. However, latex --> dvi --> dvipdfmx --> pdf for \documentclass[dvipdfmx]{article} \def\pgfsysdriver{pgfsy

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:53:26 +0900 schrieb Akira Kakuto: > Thus problems are in pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def > and pgfsys-xetex.def. I can avoid the problem by redefining this two commands of a current pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def: \documentclass[]{article} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{tcolorbox} % \tcbuselibr

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le mar. 24 juin 2014 à 14h53, Akira Kakuto a écrit : > Thus problems are in pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def and pgfsys-xetex.def. Thanks for this analysis. I tried to understand the differences between each of these files and its previous version: ╭ │ http://www.tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/te

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le mar. 24 juin 2014 à 15h18, Ulrike Fischer a écrit : > I can avoid the problem by redefining this two commands of a current > pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def: > > \documentclass[]{article} > \usepackage{lipsum} > \usepackage{tcolorbox} > % > \tcbuselibrary{breakable} > > \makeatletter > \def\pgfsys@dvipdfm

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le mar. 24 juin 2014 à 15h43, Denis Bitouzé a écrit : > Sorry, I don't understand: either commented or commented out, this > doesn't give the expected result. Oooops, sorry for the noise (I didn't compile the right file): indeed, your example as it is (with comments) gives the expected result. -

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Akira Kakuto
Dear Ulrike, I can avoid the problem by redefining this two commands of a current pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def: Thanks. I find it is also ok with \documentclass[]{article} \usepackage{lipsum} \usepackage{tcolorbox} % \tcbuselibrary{breakable} \makeatletter \def\pgfsys@dvipdfmx@suspendcontent{% \spe

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:48:02 +0200 schrieb Denis Bitouzé: >> Sorry, I don't understand: either commented or commented out, this >> doesn't give the expected result. > Oooops, sorry for the noise (I didn't compile the right file): indeed, > your example as it is (with comments) gives the expected

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:30:41 +0900 schrieb Akira Kakuto: > Dear Ulrike, > >> I can avoid the problem by redefining this two commands of a current >> pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def: > \makeatletter > \def\pgfsys@dvipdfmx@suspendcontent{% > \special{pdf: bcontent}% > \special{pdf:code q -1 0 0 -1 0 0 cm

Re: [XeTeX] Bug with color \specials?

2014-06-24 Thread Joseph Wright
On 24/06/2014 14:18, Ulrike Fischer wrote: > Am Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:53:26 +0900 schrieb Akira Kakuto: > >> Thus problems are in pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def >> and pgfsys-xetex.def. > > I can avoid the problem by redefining this two commands of a current > pgfsys-dvipdfmx.def: [snip] > But the binary (x

[XeTeX] Fontspec v2.4 (25/05/2014) misbehaving?

2014-06-24 Thread Elliott Roper
A freshly installed TeXLive 2014 produces OK output from its version of fontspec’s fontspec-example.tex, but after updating with TeXLive utility the new one fails with __ ERROR: Undefined control sequence. --- TeX said --- \__fontspec_calc_scale:n ..._tmpb_dim }\f

Re: [XeTeX] Fontspec v2.4 (25/05/2014) misbehaving?

2014-06-24 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Jun 24, 2014, at 6:49 PM, Elliott Roper wrote: > A freshly installed TeXLive 2014 produces OK output from its version of > fontspec’s fontspec-example.tex, but after updating with TeXLive utility the > new one fails with > __ > ERROR: Undefined control sequen