[XeTeX] embedding PDF, 1.4 vs. 1.5

2014-06-17 Thread maxwell
Late last year, I ran into a problem in which I could embed a PDF v1.4, but not v1.5 (I have not tried this with newer versions of PDFs, which are now up to 1.7). The problem and its work-around are described here: http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2012-October/023677.html also http://tu

Re: [XeTeX] embedding PDF, 1.4 vs. 1.5

2014-06-17 Thread maxwell
On 2014-06-17 11:31, maxwell wrote: Late last year, I ran into a problem in which I could embed a PDF v1.4, but not v1.5 (I have not tried this with newer versions of PDFs, which are now up to 1.7). The problem and its work-around are described here: http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2012-Oc

Re: [XeTeX] embedding PDF, 1.4 vs. 1.5

2014-06-17 Thread Heiko Oberdiek
On 17.06.2014 17:38, maxwell wrote: > On 2014-06-17 11:31, maxwell wrote: >> Late last year, I ran into a problem in which I could embed a PDF >> v1.4, but not v1.5 (I have not tried this with newer versions of PDFs, >> which are now up to 1.7). The problem and its work-around are >> described her

Re: [XeTeX] FakeBold vs TikZ

2014-06-17 Thread Ross Moore
Hi Stefan, Marcin, and others, On 17/06/2014, at 7:29 AM, Stefan Solbrig wrote: > Hi, > >>> Just compiled the document under TeX Live 2013 (all updates till the >>> freeze) and still no dot. Interesting. I just tried with TeXLive 2013 and 2014 on different Macs. 2013 has the dot! 2014 does *

Re: [XeTeX] FakeBold vs TikZ

2014-06-17 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Jun 17, 2014, at 7:53 PM, Ross Moore wrote: > > Interesting. > > I just tried with TeXLive 2013 and 2014 on different Macs. > > 2013 has the dot! > 2014 does *not* have the dot. > Howdy, That's strange... I saw no dot with either 2013 or 2014, both on Mac. Was you test on Linux? Good

Re: [XeTeX] FakeBold vs TikZ

2014-06-17 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:53:40AM +1000, Ross Moore wrote: > It seems that one cannot break up the processing any more, > or at least not in the simple-minded way. > Would one of the developers please explain how to do this > kind of testing now. So called “native” fonts (AKA non-TFM fonts) are

Re: [XeTeX] FakeBold vs TikZ

2014-06-17 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Jun 17, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:53:40AM +1000, Ross Moore wrote: >> It seems that one cannot break up the processing any more, >> or at least not in the simple-minded way. >> Would one of the developers please explain how to do this >> kind of test