Thanks,
I tried both and they have some issues with biblatex. I found
latex2doc more useful especially is you are working on highly
annotated texts in the humanities.
here is the link to it:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.heslin/Software/Latex/latex2doc.php
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, BP
I'm working on highly annotated documents using xelatex. I have been
working with texshop, but I want to use emacs (actually aquamacs) as
an editor because of the capabilities of the auctex package for emacs
to fold chunks of code, like footnotes, etc.
For my surprise, I found that emacs 24 stil
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 Jacobo Myerston wrote:
> I'm working on highly annotated documents using xelatex. I have been
> working with texshop, but I want to use emacs (actually aquamacs) as
> an editor because of the capabilities of the auctex package for emacs
> to fold chunks of code, like footnot
thanks so much.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 Jacobo Myerston wrote:
>
>> I'm working on highly annotated documents using xelatex. I have been
>> working with texshop, but I want to use emacs (actually aquamacs) as
>> an editor because of the cap
Jacobo Myerston
writes:
Hi Jacobo,
> I'm working on highly annotated documents using xelatex. I have been
> working with texshop, but I want to use emacs (actually aquamacs) as
> an editor because of the capabilities of the auctex package for emacs
> to fold chunks of code, like footnotes, etc.
