Hi,
[snip]
Two possible smartfont techniques for such locale feature are:
- alternate french punctuation marks with larger sidebearings: this is
very unflexible for users (punctuation characters without additional
space or with different space width are troublesome) but of course
simplifies the
2012/9/6 Tobias Schoel :
> Hi,
>
> [snip]
>
>
>> Two possible smartfont techniques for such locale feature are:
>> - alternate french punctuation marks with larger sidebearings: this is
>> very unflexible for users (punctuation characters without additional
>> space or with different space width ar
Hi,
Am 2012-09-06 16:36, schrieb Zdenek Wagner:
2012/9/6 Tobias Schoel :
It's simply checking for a flag that says "I want French Spacing" and then
including white space (in whatever form) at appropriate places. You can take
appropriate white space from the font according to your liking (there
2012/9/6 Georg Duffner :
> Hi,
>
> Am 2012-09-06 16:36, schrieb Zdenek Wagner:
>>
>> 2012/9/6 Tobias Schoel :
>>
>>>
>>> It's simply checking for a flag that says "I want French Spacing" and
>>> then
>>> including white space (in whatever form) at appropriate places. You can
>>> take
>>> appropriat
First, I do not see FreeSerif in your declarations. Anyway, it seems
to me that FreeBSD comes with an old version of GNU FreeFont (several
Linux distributions do the same). XeTeX then finds FreeSerif and
FreeSans from your FreeBSD, not the new version distributed with TeX
Live. The fonts distribute
2012/9/7 Philip TAYLOR :
>
>
> Zdenek Wagner wrote:
>
>> The fonts distributed with the system have always the highest
>> priority, you canot override them by the configuration file.
>
>
> I don't know what a configuration file is in this context, Zdeněk,
> but the XeTeX documentation seems to make
Zdenek Wagner wrote:
Of course, you can specify exact font file in XeTeX (even
using the fontspec package in XeLaTeX) but then the file is not
portable.
But isn't "non-portability" implicit in using system fonts,
Zdeněk ? As this very thread has exposed, your version of
font F may not be t
2012/9/7 Philip TAYLOR :
>
>
>
> Zdenek Wagner wrote:
>
>> Of course, you can specify exact font file in XeTeX (even
>> using the fontspec package in XeLaTeX) but then the file is not
>> portable.
>
>
> But isn't "non-portability" implicit in using system fonts,
> Zdeněk ? As this very thread has
Zdenek Wagner wrote:
The fonts distributed with the system have always the highest
priority, you canot override them by the configuration file.
I don't know what a configuration file is in this context, Zdeněk,
but the XeTeX documentation seems to make it explicit that
one can select a parti
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
> page breaks but will compile. If the font is loaded from a specific
> path and another user does not have the font in the very same path,
> the document will not compile. Of course, the best way would be if the
If I need a document to be portable, I'll in
I am happy to say that I finally got it working. Those Freefonts were
installed on my computer no less than four times (not counting texlive).
Moodle installed them as did Joomla. I had installed them from the
ports collection and apparently the system installed them, or perhaps it
was X-windows.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Neal Delmonico
wrote:
> FreeSerif is a nice looking Devanagari font, but it is
> still not up to where it needs to be in order for me to use it
> regularly.
I hope I'm not wrong but the FreeSerif Devanagari glyphs seem to be
derived from Lohit Devanagari (https://
The FreeSerif is not a complete font. The font tables for Devnagari are not
fully implemented in it.
But FreeSans has the necessary tables so it works. I also suggested some
corrections which were incorporated in to the FreeSans.
DVG
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> O
13 matches
Mail list logo
