[XeTeX] Development repository of bidi package

2011-11-06 Thread Vafa Khalighi
Hi Development repository of bidi package is changed to http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/bidi/ (thanks to Karl Berry for suggesting http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua) I expect all bug reported to go there. Thanks -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List in

Re: [XeTeX] Trouble with the new Xetex

2011-11-06 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 06.11.2011 um 02:15 schrieb Andrew Gollan: > The Invalid glyph is > actually the result of a \=V in one place, but the \=y is being printed as > a spiral in the PDF if that is remove V with macron does not exist in Unicode (but U with macron does, so it looks bad, until you invent a good mac

Re: [XeTeX] Trouble with the new Xetex

2011-11-06 Thread Peter Baker
Cardo now has a very nice italic face. You'll also find y+macron in the DejaVu fonts. Oh, and if you look up the Medieval Unicode Font Initiative page, you'll find others listed, since all MUFI-compliant fonts are supposed to have that character. Peter S. Baker University of Virginia On Nov 6,

Re: [XeTeX] Trouble with the new Xetex

2011-11-06 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 06.11.2011 um 12:41 schrieb Andrew Gollan: > It used to work. Yes! I too remember that I could typeset documents in Palatino Linotype with XeLaTeX. Actually I still can! Sorry, I'm a bit busy with other things today… But what I've found is that your use of composed characters with macro

Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011

2011-11-06 Thread Alessandro Ceschini
Le 31/10/2011 19:47, Alessandro Ceschini a écrit : Hi My problem is kind of complicated: 1. After processing a XeLaTeX source file the yellow lines the cross-reference between pdf and source file and vice versa is completely broken. 2. This happens after I updated to Ubuntu 11.10, TexLive 201

Re: [XeTeX] Trouble with the new Xetex

2011-11-06 Thread Andrew Gollan
All this makes sense, except the regression. It used to work. The code that made it work has been either removed or broken. Is this not a bug? I don't want to have to restrict my choice of fonts when code exists/existed to seamlessly give me what I used to have. Surely this is regressing many docu

Re: [XeTeX] Trouble with the new Xetex

2011-11-06 Thread Heiko Oberdiek
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 11:37:08AM +0100, Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Am 06.11.2011 um 02:15 schrieb Andrew Gollan: > > > The Invalid glyph is > > actually the result of a \=V in one place, but the \=y is being printed as > > a spiral in the PDF if that is remove > > V with macron does not exist i

Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011

2011-11-06 Thread Andy Lin
I don't use Ubuntu, but if you have both TL2010 and 2011, I'd check the directories that are in fontconfig (or run fc-cache -v and see which directories it's looking in). It may be that fontspec is complaining because it finds duplicate sets of fonts between the two installations. Your PDFs would b

Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011

2011-11-06 Thread Alessandro Ceschini
To Andy: Hi No, I only have TL2011 and nothing of the bundled version (2009) is installed, and no, there's no duplicate of the font, actually this happens with every font, it's a bit weird for every font to be duplicated. The directories are the standard ones: \usr\share\fonts and ~\.fonts\

Re: [XeTeX] Anchor names

2011-11-06 Thread Ross Moore
Hi Heiko, and Akira, On 06/11/2011, at 3:55 AM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote: > \special{% > pdf:ann width 4bp height 2bp depth 2bp<<% > /Type/Annot% > /foo/ab#abc > /Subtype/Link% > /Border[0 0 1]% > /C[0 0 1]% blue border > /A<<%

Re: [XeTeX] Wacky behavior of XeLaTeX in TeXLive 2011

2011-11-06 Thread Andy Lin
Hmm, according to that ticket on the texwork site, someone else has the same problem, so it doesn't seem to be something unique to your set up. I'm surprised that it's SyncTeX that's the culprit, since the project page hasn't been updated since 2008, unless it's moved. Unfortunately, I can't help