> Hi,
>
> what is the preferred way of producing roman numerals as stylistic
> alternatives (while still inputing arabic numerals)? Unicode says, that
> using the codepoints for roman numerals is deprecated and it seems fair
> to me, as the meaning is the same.
>
> \romand{} works of course,
I solved this problem removing the fonts I download from sourceforge.net and
installing the font available in ctan.
On Jun 16, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Rik wrote:
> On 2011-06-13 16:38, Sebastian Gerecke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried the new version 5 of the Linux Libertine font. I'm getting a way to
>
Am 17.06.2011 19:29, schrieb Andy Lin:
You have to be careful with Chinese. In Mandarin, you have Pinyin, but
you also have several conflicting romanization schemes in use in
Taiwan and older literature. For Cantonese, Hokkien, etc, syllable
boundaries are not quite as easy to determine because t
Hi,
you totally misunderstood my intentions. I don't want to use neither Ⅰ,
Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, … (u2160-u217f) nor I, II, III, IV, … (letters). I want to use
something along "Henri {\fontchangingcommand 4} was a foobar king."
Is \fontspec capable of doing this?
bye
Toscho
Am 18.06.2011 12:51, schrie
> Hi,
>
> you totally misunderstood my intentions. I don't want to use
> neither Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, … (u2160-u217f) nor I, II, III, IV, … (letters). I want
> to use
> something along "Henri {\fontchangingcommand 4} was a foobar king."
>
> Is \fontspec capable of doing this?
Of course not, or maybe
